You are absolutely wrong about this.
Measurements don't tell the real story regarding those.
I have heard the new 7G Silver Series (owned the Silver 6G too), Gold, Platinum, had the Kefs LS50 and Metas, auditioned R3, R7, Reference 3. Also owned Q Concept 500 and Sonus Faber Sonetto V. Currently using Canton Reference on my daily main system.
I can tell you there is a incredible difference on sound quality between the Silver 7 G and the PL100 II. The Platinums are in another league in everything sound wise. They are incredible sounding spakers. Probably one of the best I have heard.
Silver series 7G are ok price-wise, similar level than the Kef's R (a little less boring slow than the R's) but no even close on how a high end loudspeaker like the Platinum sound. Kef's Reference are on a similar level than Platinums. I really liked the bass on those Platinums and the treble is very smooth and natural.
Price/performance-wise. To me, the best speakers so far have been the Canton's Reference . They sound almost as good as the Kefs Reference and MA Platinum but are about 60% of their price. Q Acoustics Concept 500 are very good price/performance too (they have an amazing sound stage).
So, NO, the Silver 7G measure well but they sound like a speaker on their price range does. They are a competitive product but no even close from what you are expecting from measurements on the reviews suggest. They use low to mid-tier quality drivers.
This is the more accurate review I have seen so far: