- Joined
- Apr 7, 2024
- Messages
- 735
- Likes
- 2,207
To a certain extent, I get it...continually battling the relentless and still-prevalent "high end" cable industry and their legions of fans is frustrating and fatiguing. But, this sort of open and aggressive display of hobbyist-PTSD is a bit wild and certainly unhelpful. This member mentioned nothing of the cables except that they simply exist. Please consider keeping your audiophile guns holstered over such trivial "signals" and encourage healthy participation. One sure-fire way to ensure that someone will not be interested in learning is to immediately make them feel foolish.
Anyway, just a note that the ribbon tweeters in the ELXs and Salks are similar but not the same. The ELXs use an Ascend-specific customized version of the RAAL 70-20XRAM.
Here's some NFS data for the towers:
Measurements for speaker Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
www.spinorama.org
Have fun with the new speakers!
I understand your criticism, and I will take it into account in the future. If the OP feels offended, I am more than happy to apologize.
However, I would like to point out one thing. My comments are not aimed at the OP in particular, nor are they aimed at this hobby (as such), much less the cable industry. In fact, they are not aimed at any specific hobby.
My comments are born out of frustration with the way people think ... or more specifically, the way they do NOT think. Clear, critical thinking seems rarely found today. Instead, the fashionable norm seems to be lazy, lackadaisical and unclear thinking. (Cue "Feelings" by Morris Albert. )
Subjectivism, my pet peeve in these pages, is simply one example of that lazy, lackadaisical and unclear thinking. (As such, the subjectivist/objectivist divide, and in fact audio in general, are insignificant footnotes in a wider human commentary. Amir has wisely bade us restrict our focus.)
So I have (narrowly) confined my comments to the audio realm ... specifically subjectivism. The OP is undoubtedly an enthusiastic audio hobbyist, and he is, as I said, undoubtedly proud of his system. I understand those points, and I have absolutely no criticism of them. His descriptions however, as he initially pointed out, are purely subjective. They have no reference, they are not scientific, and most pointedly, they are not reproducible.
The OP needs to understand why that is important.
Jim
Last edited: