• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Markaudio MAOP 11.2 in my sphere speaker cabinets

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,624
Likes
1,893
Location
Budapest
After doing two very successful projects with the Markaudio CHN110 and the Markaudio Pluvia 11 I have decided to try the MAOP 11.2 in my front spheres in the living room
I am interested if there is going to be any audible difference compared to the much cheaper CHN110 model, especially given the fact that I apply heavy DSP with Dirac Live 3 and various VST plugins
And also just for fun since I love experimenting with various full range drivers :)

The drivers shall arrive early next week. I will need to make some small adjustments to the sphere cabinets so that the MAOPs could fit (since they are a bit bigger than the CHN110s).
I will post pictures next week and once the drivers are fitted I will post the usual measurements too to compare apples to apples in the main listening position.

If they sound 'better' (?) I will replace my rear spheres too - at least that's the plan
 
The MAOPs have just arrived:

20241014_094455.jpg

20241014_094502.jpg

20241014_094519.jpg

20241014_094438.jpg


To me they are simply gorgeous; they will look really great in the white sphere cabinets
Unfortunately they are a bit bigger than the CHN110s so I will first need to adjust the spheres to fit them

Stay tuned!
 
The spheres have been modified accordingly and the MAOPs are now in place:

20241018_215928.jpg


20241018_220013.jpg


I must say I really love the looks. The matte white cones are matching perfectly with the matte white finish of the cabinets

Now let's see the measurements!

Frequency response of the CHN110 vs the MAOP 11.2

1729595083950.png


Left channel, the MAOP is the one highlighted. Both measurements were taken at the MLP (at around 250cm from the speakers), no DSP whatsoever, just the pure response
Actually there is not much of a difference between the two, except for maybe around the 1kHz region and a slight difference btw. 3500 and 7500Hz

And when EQ-d to flat, basically all the difference is gone:
(this is just the predicted flat EQ in REW for both)
1729595292761.png


I am attaching the mdat file, so that those who are interested in the other graphs can take a look

Subjective comparison:
The difference is very subtle, I am 100% sure I would not be able to tell the difference in a blind test...
I think I hear the vocals and the treble being 'softer' and 'silkier'. Somehow easier to listen

I am planning to replace the rear speakers too, just to have the same look for all four ;)
 

Attachments

  • MAOP 11 vs CHN110.zip
    2.1 MB · Views: 31
May I ask what is your source ? And with what did you reach this level of flatness ? Amp ? Maybe something about the sub ?
You are runnign 4.1 (or Quad stereo). I like your setup.
Greetings from Germany, a fellow Hungarian :)
 
May I ask what is your source ? And with what did you reach this level of flatness ? Amp ? Maybe something about the sub ?
You are runnign 4.1 (or Quad stereo). I like your setup.
Greetings from Germany, a fellow Hungarian :)

:)
Happy to hear that there is more of us here!

The source is a PC (Windows 11), using Jriver Media Center to play audio/video and also running Dirac Live 3 that makes the response flat (it has nothing to do with the amp/sub, etc.)
This is how the signal chain looks like: PC --> miniDSP U-DIO8* via USB --> three Sabaj A30A FDAs (full digital amp) via digit coax (SPDIF)
* this is not a DSP unit, this is just a multichannel DDC (digital-digital converter) to convert USB to multiple SPDIF outputs
All the DSP is done in the PC in Jriver (channel mapping, crossover, delay, Dirac Live, etc.)

I am running 4.1 with this sub and very soon this second sub will be engaged too, so it will be 4.2 then
Sub integration is done manually based on acoustic reference measurements
 
Last edited:
Nice project.

Can you tell a little more about the spheres? I mean the housing.
 
Nice project.

Can you tell a little more about the spheres? I mean the housing.
Thank you

Please read the first post, you will see some links there that will show you the details of the sphere projects (build, measurements, etc.)
 
Ah found it. Already had those bowls in my hand thinking about to do the same. Thanks for proof of concept.

How did you get those perfect cut outs? Looks like you have access to a milling machine?
 
Back
Top Bottom