It appears to be a random "slap a name on stuff and sell it' marketplace product sent by a user. I don't think there's any reputation to damage. That said, I'm sure Amirm would add a correction or put up a new post if it was needed (eg. if this particular unit was broken).Actually, if we think the sample may be damaged why give it a headless panther in the first place?
For the time being, the verdict seems a bit harsh to me. Headless panther can have serious impact for a company.
IMO get a second unit to test or wait for a vendor response.
There's the irony. If Amir tested a broken device sent by a reader in unknown condition, and reported incorrect results without checking in with the manufacturer despite seeing their snr and distortion figures don't match the 22.8 db SINAD ... negligence? Recklessness? Protected speech? I have no idea.Jokes aside it’s probably broken ?
If we want to drag the ghost of Tekton into this... well, Amir tested the unit he has and published the result as-is, even if there's reason to believe the sample might be broken. This is the same thing Stereophile has been doing for decades. They both give the manufacturer a chance to respond if they want, which is not something the law requires, so much as journalistic integrity.There's the irony. If Amir tested a broken device sent by a reader in unknown condition, and reported incorrect results without checking in with the manufacturer despite seeing their snr and distortion figures don't match the 22.8 db SINAD ... negligence? Recklessness? Protected speech? I have no idea.
There's the irony. If Amir tested a broken device sent by a reader in unknown condition, and reported incorrect results without checking in with the manufacturer despite seeing their snr and distortion figures don't match the 22.8 db SINAD ... negligence? Recklessness? Protected speech? I have no idea.
The fact that something is shipped broken is of interest to membership as well. Remember, it is a practice among some companies to specify chip specs and not real measurements.There's the irony. If Amir tested a broken device sent by a reader in unknown condition, and reported incorrect results without checking in with the manufacturer despite seeing their snr and distortion figures don't match the 22.8 db SINAD ... negligence? Recklessness? Protected speech? I have no idea.
There it is. The perfect tube-amp mod for "warm" sound.
Could be worse: it's not broken-in. I mean, burned in. You know, same as cables. They never sound good without 300+ hrs of burning-in. Better with good music.Surely it's broken
5. Tekton without the feetPoll options:
- Bad
- Awful
- WTF
- OMFG this sucks
This has nothing to do with warm sound because there are also tons of uneven harmonics and a clipped sine which again also has zero to do with warm tube sound.
Thought folks here were more knowledgable than this...distortion =/= distortion, it all boils down to what kind of distortion you have and in what amount.
Yes, but that doesn't make it any less "warm". Warm is just the name people have given to certain types of distortion. On the music production side there is a whole cottage industry devoted to creating software that has various versions of this "warmth".the "warm" sound tube-enthusiasts fawn about is basically just raw distortion.