I appreciate all the kind remarks and constructive feedback!
To chime in on this topic, keep in mind we've been around for 14 years and our first analyzer was a Prism dScope Series III. Analog input resolution of the dScope is a bit better than an APx525. When we released Atom Amp in 2018, I knew it measured better than our dScope, and was not concerned by how much better. We had no idea Atom Amp would render anything older than an APx525 so obsolete! Many manufactures choose to invest in the APx555 as a response.
Our APx555 is not meant as a marketing spiel. Rather, it's made my job faster and easier. Thorough D/A tests consumed about 30 minutes per run on the dScope due to manual setups and slow averaging. The APx555 runs the most valuable tests in a couple minutes automatically. So, I can ponder hardware and firmware tweaks while a trusted technician runs dozens of iterations in one afternoon. Results are saved to a shared folder of PDFs. It's incredible how quickly ideas come together with the right tools.
The race to bigger numbers has been fun. Alas, we're all so far beyond transparency today that it's time to ponder what matters in bringing more enjoyment to this hobby in the next decade.