The PA7 plus is load dependent, so it’s not transparent. Depending on your speakers this may be audible, certainly more than some distortion better than say -70 dB.But to answer your question, yes, everything else is essentially "transparent".
The PA7 plus is load dependent, so it’s not transparent. Depending on your speakers this may be audible, certainly more than some distortion better than say -70 dB.But to answer your question, yes, everything else is essentially "transparent".
Goldensounds likes „everything“ (expensive). It’s an informercial. There is no evidence whatsoever why it would sound better. Follow the advice already given by the previous posters. Focus on speakers and RoomEQ.What's interesting about this is that the person measuring really likes the Denafrips DACs, even though they measure some 30db more noise than the best DACs.
The PA7 plus is load dependent, so it’s not transparent. Depending on your speakers this may be audible, certainly more than some distortion better than say -70 dB.
I’m wondering what sources you have that needs the Topping pre amp?
To me it doesn’t sound like a preamp is of any value. Perhaps spend on a DAC with EQ and a excellent headphone amp. I can recommend the RME ADI v2.The Wim Pro and Denafrips DAC, also I have the Hifiman XS headphones. I would be fine with getting rid of the Pre-amp if I don't need it. I could just get a DAC with a "transparent" preamp and get a desktop headphone amp for my headphones.
Too me it doesn’t sound like a preamp is of any value. Perhaps spend on a DAC with EQ and a excellent headphone amp. I can recommend the RME ADI v2.
Yes far better than most. The RME has been tested here.Thanks, I'm going to research that DAC today. So I can just go straight to one of my amps with the RME ADI v2 and use it to control the volume while maintaining a great SINAD?
Nice!Yes far better than most. The RME has been tested here.
Would not bother with anything from Denafrips if you have other options. Some measurements:
Denafrips Pontus 2 (12th Anniversary Edition) Measurements - GoldenSound
Measurements of the Denafrips Pontus 2 12th Anniversary R2R DAC, and testing to see whether claims of NOS capability are true.goldensound.audioDenafrips Ares 2 Measurements and Review - GoldenSound
Review and Measurements of the Ares 2. This DAC is not actually a NOS dac, but it's still one of the best options under $1000 and sounds wonderful.goldensound.audioDenafrips Terminator Plus (With Gaia) Measurements - GoldenSound
The Terminator plus is a high performing R2R dac and the flagship dac in Denafrips' product range. Now that I have a unit in-house I wanted to get a full set of measurements completed.goldensound.audio
As you can see Denafrips is not flat out "bad" but their units leave much to be desired in terms of modern measurement performance and little "bugs"/inconsistencies with their units. I would not get an R2R dac in 2023, most of it is advertising gimmick. Any modern Chinese dac at a fraction of the price will get you 116-120 dB SINAD easily and probably better all-around performance. I don't even think most of the Denafrips products come with a remote control. The main thing going for them is that they have a nice looking chassis.
If you don't need the preamp for other additional analogue inputs I would personally get one of the topping headphone amp/dac all in ones to replace two devices with one. If you don't care about additional analogue inputs and also don't use headphones then something like https://www.audiophonics.fr/en/inte...th-2x250w-4-ohm-32bit-768khz-dsd-p-17004.html is a nice all-in-one product (wireless linkplay streamer virtually identical to Wiim, Ncore amplifier which is similar spec to the Topping, transparent dac)
But to answer your question, yes, everything else is essentially "transparent".
Yes I voted it poor because I reckon there are a lot of real-world loads it won't be optimal into.The PA7 plus is load dependent, so it’s not transparent. Depending on your speakers this may be audible, certainly more than some distortion better than say -70 dB.
Thanks,Yes I voted it poor because I reckon there are a lot of real-world loads it won't be optimal into.
If I were the O/P first thing I'd be doing is getting a proper amplifier. Nothing else needs changing, and the speakers listed are all decent.
You can get a better transparent DAC for 200.00 than the Denafrips. The Cost of the RME is the DSP and features. I also own a Topping D30 Pro which I use more often.Nice!
Would this DAC offer similar performance as a pre-amp, minus the EQ?
Loxjie D40 Pro DAC & HP:
Loxjie D40 Pro DAC & HP Amp Review
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Loxjie D40 Pro balanced stereo DAC and headphone amplifier. It was sent to me by the company. It normally costs US $430 but is on sale for $388. The enclosure is metal but the silver look makes you think it is made out of plastic. The 7 segment...audiosciencereview.com
I would look just at the measurements only on that other site I posted. That guy doing them is a bit of a weirdo and has some strange "opinions", although the measurements themselves are valid enough to compare to ASRs.What's interesting about this is that the person measuring really likes the Denafrips DACs, even though they measure some 30db more noise than the best DACs.
AgreedThere's value in knowing that the system is not doing anything you don't want it to do (in this case, that it's "transparent") up to the point where the signal reaches the speakers. Now, you focus on the speakers and the room knowing that any issues that arise are localized to those. There's no such thing as a fully transparent system once you introduce speakers and rooms. Up to the speakers, you can do it. But as soon as sound comes out of the speakers and starts bouncing around the room, you're trying to do the best you can. It will never be perfect.
I would look just at the measurements only on that other site I posted. That guy doing them is a bit of a weirdo and has some strange "opinions", although the measurements themselves are valid enough to compare to ASRs.
If you already have the denafrips you don't really have to replace it based on our comments, it will perform fine. But if you don't have it already, I would look elsewhere. As someone mentioned for Denafrips money you could be buying an RME ADI-2 DAC, or simply saving a bunch and getting any competent dac as cheap as $100.
Some people like having an analogue preamp as "insurance" that a direct DAC-to-poweramp connection is not going to blow their speakers by outputting 0dBFS due to the volume resetting or something but it is not exactly necessary if you're careful. Reliable gear like the RME should hopefully not really have a problem with that.
As others have stated if your budget is constrained I'd also worry more about speakers/DSP before spending more on gear if you already have an alternative. An audio chain with a 70 or 80 dB SINAD that outputs to good/flat speakers and a controlled room will likely always sound better than a "fully transparent" 100dB chain that has problems at the transducer/room end. For most people, getting a second hand AV receiver for $100-300 bucks for example and using the rest of the budget/time on the speakers to fix that end of it make more sense. You can always upgrade those later/change devices, but that is mostly just for technical perfection or quality if life rather than changing a sound signature.
I'd like to know why the OP's thought his system was not transparent in the first place?
Something triggered his dissatisfaction, if indeed it was dissatisfaction, but he obviously thinks lack of transparency is the culprit.
How does one come to that conclusion?