Hedd introduce their ‘mark II’ range of loudspeakers which include their lineariser.
Keith
Keith
Last edited:
No, I left HEDD more than 3yrs ago.@KSTR Were you involved this time?
All the new features appear intelligently implemented. It will give the non-technical crowd a taste for DSP and correct integration, though I still dislike HEDD's refusal to provide detailed measurements.
I second that.I really sincerely hope that the driver integration, directivity and AMT performance is much improved (not that worried about on-axis FR with lineariser). I wish HEDD would release at least polars; even Dynaudio and ADAM has more data, let alone the transparent brands like Neumann and Genelec.
Hmmm. Is the correction then in software on the host even though they have a DSP in the speaker?https://www.hedd.audio/wp-content/downloads/HEDD-Lineariser-Manual.pdf
Measurements on the last pages.
Not dumb... rather, Smart and wise.Maybe I'm dumb, but where can I find detail on this? I can't find anything even on their website. Anyway, my stance is now simple: give exhaustive measurements or get out of my wallet's sight.
And why no LADSPA/LV2 lineariser plugin for UNIX users?
Yeah it's not clear is it? Most setup examples have a DAC in there so correction must be in the host? Also it is not clear if you need to conduct measurements or that it has lookups of the HEDD models that it allows you to select.Hmmm. Is the correction then in software on the host even though they have a DSP in the speaker?
View attachment 96984
If I understand it correctly it relies on the processing power of the host to achieve that theoretical ruler flat anechoic response(and phase correction) they've shown, but any room EQ needs to be applied independently afterwards. Interesting approach.Yeah it's not clear is it? Most setup examples have a DAC in there so correction must be in the host? Also it is not clear if you need to conduct measurements or that it has lookups of the HEDD models that it allows you to select.
I second that.
Same goes for measurements of CoP performance, now that they're advertising it. I really wonder how tight of a fit they achieve with those inserts and if they are able to control resonance.
Those plots show the effect of the DAW plugin/ standalone app feeding Mk1s. So unfortunately still no measurements of Mk2 disclosed.Hmmm. Is the correction then in software on the host even though they have a DSP in the speaker?
View attachment 96984