Except for the 2.5mm so close to the knob. That is a pretty silly flaw, imo.The other thing the P50 does is to provide an objectively excellent aesthetic.
I can't agree with your interpretation of what Zeos is saying.
To me, it seem pretty clear that what he is saying is that it is less analytical. If you want analytical, it's thew worst. If you want 'warmer' it's the best.
He does admit that feel, fit finish and looks are an important factor and that he could perhaps be biased to an opinion because of that - although he doesn't make this point that clearly.
However, I tend to agree with the following post (in other words, don't take his listening impressions as worth anything):
The other thing the P50 does is to provide an objectively excellent aesthetic.
The other thing the P50 does is to provide an objectively excellent aesthetic.
Which should have been 4,5mm connector and they should have included 4,5mm to 2,5mm adaptor. This is a full blown desktop product after all.Except for the 2.5mm so close to the knob. That is a pretty silly flaw, imo.
so d50 can't be plugged into a wall?
Hi, I'm looking for an amp for my Akg k712 pro, the A50 topping is a good choice for me ?
After some months now with the amp, I've come to the conclusion that the 2.5mm balanced port is a bullet point feature with little to no value. It is indeed too close to the volume knob, and with the exception of total available power is worse performing in every metric. I don't see the appeal.
2.5mm connectors are weak, and not exactly a common option for headphone cables. It's pretty easy to get a 2.5mm balanced cable for IEMs, but really, what's the point of that? The amp provides sufficient power through its single ended outputs to drive even my power hungry Fostex T50RP beyond reasonable levels.
If they ever introduce an A50s, I hope they do away with the balanced output nonsense all together and just focus on the fundamentals. Also, please swap the behavior of the power button. Short press for on/off, long press for switching gains would be far better in my opinion. Going to hit the off button and getting a +9db volume bump instead because you didn't hold it down isn't my favorite user story of all time.
Many adapters areso d50 can't be plugged into a wall?
A50s will still have balanced out but with 4.4mm. That's the idea of A50s. Two most important aspects: 1, no channel imbalance at all. 2, balanced output in a relatively small box.After some months now with the amp, I've come to the conclusion that the 2.5mm balanced port is a bullet point feature with little to no value. It is indeed too close to the volume knob, and with the exception of total available power is worse performing in every metric. I don't see the appeal.
2.5mm connectors are weak, and not exactly a common option for headphone cables. It's pretty easy to get a 2.5mm balanced cable for IEMs, but really, what's the point of that? The amp provides sufficient power through its single ended outputs to drive even my power hungry Fostex T50RP beyond reasonable levels.
If they ever introduce an A50s, I hope they do away with the balanced output nonsense all together and just focus on the fundamentals. Also, please swap the behavior of the power button. Short press for on/off, long press for switching gains would be far better in my opinion. Going to hit the off button and getting a +9db volume bump instead because you didn't hold it down isn't my favorite user story of all time.
yesIs there an A90 in the works to pair with D90?
It enables people to buy more things which I guess is fun..People are seriously still fussing about with rolling opamps? Really, why? A piece of electronic equipment is designed explicitly around the spec'd components. Enabling users to muss about with the circuit sounds like far more trouble than its worth from the manufacturers perspective.