What class D amp are you referring to?
My bad, I thought Denon amp was Class D, its AB. Butthen its still a budget AB.
What class D amp are you referring to?
You should have more than enough power to hit the speaker stops with the Buckeye NC502MP.Reason why I splurged on a buckeye 502mp… let’s go 500W and see the difference shall we
My bad, I thought Denon amp was Class D, its AB. Butthen its still a budget AB.
This conclusion is supported by the evidence. So long as neither amplifier exhibits an uneven frequency response, high noise floor, is malfunctioning or being driven to clipping, listeners will consistently fail to distinguish between them under controlled ABX conditions. I suggest that you have a look at the essential AES reading thread.
Limited budget? At least for some people, probably even *most* people. But yeah, even with my budget, it's not something I would buy. But apparently some people do.
I think in most audio interfaces ADC and DAC can be configured (if it's not the default anyway) to use the same clock so its drift should not be an issue for null tests.
There’s actually a decent chance that properly set up and level matched at reasonable volume, ( not beyond what both amps can do, of course) blind tested, iyou won’t tell it apart barometric the Cambridge. I think in a way that’s where we came in. If you listen at high volumes the story could be differentReason why I splurged on a buckeye 502mp… let’s go 500W and see the difference shall we
I thought that those interfaces without wordclock usually use one clock for ADC and DAC simultaneous.I have not see many commercial interfaces with wordclock inputs and built-in generators.
In the professional recording business yes.. wordclock inputs and wordclock generators are common and would allow for perfect nulling.
If you ignore all postings based on scientific evidence you'll learn nothing here.
I am glad that this plae has ignore feature so I can avoid such posts.
I thought that those interfaces without wordclock usually use one clock for ADC and DAC simultaneous.
There’s no need to be upset by this version. All it is trying to say is that if you exclude every reason why two amplifiers may be audibly different, then when ltested blind they should sound the same.
I am glad that this plae has ignore feature so I can avoid such posts.
What is a plae?
There’s no need to be upset by this version. All it is trying to say is that if you exclude every reason why two amplifiers may be [but should not be] audibly different, then when ltested blind they should sound the same.
There’s no need to be upset by this version. All it is trying to say is that if you exclude every reason why two amplifiers may be audibly different, then when ltested blind they should sound the same.
For amplifier, as it has been used in this thread, no - you haven’t fixed it and I suggest you read back to the statement I was describing.Fixed that for ya.
Because:
exhibits an uneven frequency response -- who thinks an amp should do that?
high noise floor -- who thinks and amp should have that?
is malfunctioning -- who thinks that's how an amp should function?
or being driven to clipping -- who thinks that's how you should use an amp?
This guy has similar opinion on the 600ne as the OP, meaning lack of bass and too laid back. Starts at 8:00:
He also compares it to a couple of CA amps.