. Fire or not at the AKM factory, they could’ve used a better DAC specially at the 41.6% price increase over the AKM 3700H.
Better how?
. Fire or not at the AKM factory, they could’ve used a better DAC specially at the 41.6% price increase over the AKM 3700H.
Measured. So far, we’ve not seen any concrete numbers for the implemented new chips from TI.Better how?
From Robert Zohn of Value Electronics
Sound United Rocks the Industry: Announces Dirac Live Functionality on Select Denon and Marantz AVRs and Pre/Pros
(September 27, 2022) CEDIA week is always full of surprises, and this is a big one. Today, Dirac and Sound United announced a collaboration to make Dirac Live available in several new AV receivers and preamps from Denon and Marantz. Bringing Dirac functionality to these brands is a major blow...www.avnirvana.com
It would probably help if I could simply find the manual, but am I correct that the only difference between 3800 and 4800 is an extra 20W per channel? Surely there's more to it
outside of feature differences, which could be small, Made in Japan vs Made in Vietnam.It would probably help if I could simply find the manual, but am I correct that the only difference between 3800 and 4800 is an extra 20W per channel? Surely there's more to it
better distortion figure (0.05 vs 0.08)4800 differences so far:
Made in Japan
125W
2 line display
front panel door
7 (1 more) HDMI input
3 trigger outs (vs 1)
zone 3 analog audio
component video in
composite video in (two)
Source https://www.crutchfield.com/p_033AVX4800/Denon-AVR-X4800H.html
when it starts to distort it goes sharply, so I think if it was 0.08%, x4800h probably pulled 127 or 128w per channel. Denon goes with 125w@0.05% because it looks nicer, that's all. still ~1dB differencebetter distortion figure (0.05 vs 0.08)
analog-to-HDMI conversion
With the good relation amir has built with Denon/Marantz, I’m wondering if the X3800H is already being measured, or it’s measured but the result has to be compared/reported to the manufacturer first. Even if the difference in SINAD of the new DACs is not audible, they may not like it if their brand new AVR measures worse than their own previous models. Fire or not at the AKM factory, they could’ve used a better DAC specially at the 41.6% price increase over the AKM 3700H.
I made no comment or value judgement whatsoever, just blindly comparing the listed specs.when it starts to distort it goes sharply, so I think if it was 0.08%, x4800h probably pulled 127 or 128w per channel. Denon goes with 125w@0.05% because it looks nicer, that's all. still ~1dB difference
and analog to HDMI conversion would be a very very niche market these days.
A $€£ 20 component to HDMI box would do it as well. I doubt that’s worth all the extra moneyI made no comment or value judgement whatsoever, just blindly comparing the listed specs.
Otherwise I agree with you. Talk about niche, the 4800 would still work with my Nintendo Wii, which has analog outputs!
Honestly if you add up the 1000% markup that each of these individual components will have you will end up with a similar number.A $€£ 20 component to HDMI box would do it as well. I doubt that’s worth all the extra money
That feature, not for sure. I don't know if the 4800 is worth the extra money.A $€£ 20 component to HDMI box would do it as well. I doubt that’s worth all the extra money
Wow, this makes the new lineup a real game changer. Even if Dirac + DLBC costs $700, that means the X3800H will get you DLBC on 4 subs for $2400. The HTP-1 at $4500 was the cheapest way to do that previously.From Robert Zohn of Value Electronics
Sound United Rocks the Industry: Announces Dirac Live Functionality on Select Denon and Marantz AVRs and Pre/Pros
(September 27, 2022) CEDIA week is always full of surprises, and this is a big one. Today, Dirac and Sound United announced a collaboration to make Dirac Live available in several new AV receivers and preamps from Denon and Marantz. Bringing Dirac functionality to these brands is a major blow...www.avnirvana.com
4800 no longer makes any sense. They should drop it and continue with 3x and 6x series. Before, only 4700 had Auro3D. Now 3800 has everything. To be honest, the marginal power difference was never worth it. Once you try an external amp, you never go back to AVR power amps. Even cheap 60W per channel amps off eBay, like Crestron 12x60 or 16x60, have better sound and better toroidal transformers.That feature, not for sure. I don't know if the 4800 is worth the extra money.
But then again, I felt the same about the 3700 vs 4700 and ended up buying a 4700 because of sheer lack of availability, and now I kindof like it. The bigger display, the front HDMI made REW much easier, the Auro2D mixer which the 3700 I think lacks but it's surprisingly decent... And I got a good deal for it which made the price difference sting a bit less.
Apparently x4700h has the same specs. It is not too surprising if they reuse the same amp design. It is even possible that x3800h has similar design with some downgrade (power limiting etc.)when it starts to distort it goes sharply, so I think if it was 0.08%, x4800h probably pulled 127 or 128w per channel. Denon goes with 125w@0.05% because it looks nicer, that's all. still ~1dB difference
and analog to HDMI conversion would be a very very niche market these days.
I think my 4700 has Auro2D while my 8500 has both 2D and 3D.4800 no longer makes any sense. They should drop it and continue with 3x and 6x series. Before, only 4700 had Auro3D. Now 3800 has everything. To be honest, the marginal power difference was never worth it. Once you try an external amp, you never go back to AVR power amps. Even cheap 60W per channel amps off eBay, like Crestron 12x60 or 16x60, have better sound and better toroidal transformers.