Like some Kef, Klipsch or Jbl tower speakers.Such as?
Ok frequency range of bass mid and so on isn't that exact. The frequency range from about the Schroeder Frequency to about 800Hz is the range I am referring to.The A180 has a way bigger baffle - more directivity in the mids and probably more directivity vertical depending on filter frequency.
There is no directivity at bass frequencies <150Hz at all - as the measurements show.
Directivity for both is very low - I would not overestimate the influence of 1dB difference there. Reflections are still very strong for both.
For sound power di 1.5dB isn't that small. E.g. a big speaker like the JBL M2 achieves about 2.5 - 3dB difference in sound power di in that range. And that is the difference of a 5" bookshelf and a big monitor with a 15" driver...
Yes of cause it is very subjective but a small nearfield monitor with a subwoofer can't compete in the mid to far field with any good speaker which is made for the higher listening distance (+ subwoofer if needed).I think the term "endgame" is very subjective. The combo of 120II+750+MA1 will be very hard to beat for the money overall and sufficient for a lot of use cases.
The main problem with speakers with such a big difference in the di in the lower and higher frequencies is that they get much less better with better room acoustics compared to a more constant di speaker. IMHO you won't get envelopment and exactness at the same time no matter how much you improve the room acoustics.
It is also not possible to get rid of the floor bounce hole in the frequency range of about 200 to 300Hz and that is one other important problem with small bookshelf speakers. The prediction of the in room response which is used to calculate the predicted preference score is a simple estimation and doesn't take such issues into account. Even an inexpensive tower speaker with multiple woofers can solve most of these issues and you can definitely hear this difference between such a speaker and a small bookshelf speaker.