Then it’s okay.Yes... I'm using IFI ASIO with VSTs...
Then it’s okay.Yes... I'm using IFI ASIO with VSTs...
Still people throwing their money at JRiver... JPlay... Roon... Audirvana..!In Windoz' Foobar2000
In Linux, Strawberry, super simple to get bit perfect and easy-comfortable to use.
Both great FREE players, why pay for anything else?
An actually intuitive UI, relevant suggestions, search function, steaming services and local library all in the same place, acces to these on the go, ability to control some streamers, multiroom playback etc etc.why pay for anything else?
Apples and oranges.Still people throwing their money at Roon... Audirvana..!
No, it won't.Foobar gonna win...
Which one is better? Roon?No, it won't.
Free offerings will always win...No, it won't.
You can have all that in foobar too but depends on the skin,plun-ins and customization which is not exactly easy.An actually intuitive UI, relevant suggestions, search function, steaming services and local library all in the same place, acces to these on the go, ability to control some streamers, multiroom playback etc etc.
Apples and oranges.
No, it won't.
Not sure why any of you would think one would be better than the other...Which one is better? Roon?
No @Sokel, it can't. foobar can't stream Tidal nor Qobuz with a proper (actually better than client apps themselves) integration. It doesn't have any suggestions algorithm, can't stream on the go from your home library, nor it can wirelessly control internal volume of some compatible DAC/Amp/Streamers (Roon Ready ones). When it comes to mobile app, please...You can have all that in foobar too
You're right about streaming services,there are some plug-ins but they are still experimental or partially working.Not sure why any of you would think one would be better than the other...
But the fact that some are still asking confirm there's still some need for this test!
No @Sokel, it can't. foobar can't stream Tidal nor Qobuz with a proper (actually better than client apps themselves) integration. It doesn't have any suggestions algorithm, can't stream on the go from your home library, nor it can wirelessly control internal volume of some compatible DAC/Amp/Streamers (Roon Ready ones). When it comes to mobile app, please...
It does seem there is a little more noise at 60Hz on some programs, but the amount is tiny and negligible. Theorising about the source, I wonder if the power draw of the CPU is responsible for this? A program that uses more and/or inefficient code could cause the CPU to draw more power and thus put a little more noise in to the "system". It would be interesting to see a comparison measurement of the same program on a PC that is under no load, and another with it under full load (with a game/benchmark etc running in the background).Free offerings will always win...
http://archimago.blogspot.com/2013/06/measurements-part-i-bit-perfect.html
If you rely on your local library then Foobar is unbeatable...No @Sokel, it can't. foobar can't stream Tidal nor Qobuz with a proper (actually better than client apps themselves) integration. It doesn't have any suggestions algorithm, can't stream on the go from your home library, nor it can wirelessly control internal volume of some compatible DAC/Amp/Streamers (Roon Ready ones). When it comes to mobile app, please...
Do you know of any remote control that support Foobar 64 bit? I'm using Android...can be done with foobarcon
Here you go:It does seem there is a little more noise at 60Hz on some programs, but the amount is tiny and negligible. Theorising about the source, I wonder if the power draw of the CPU is responsible for this? A program that uses more and/or inefficient code could cause the CPU to draw more power and thus put a little more noise in to the "system". It would be interesting to see a comparison measurement of the same program on a PC that is under no load, and another with it under full load (with a game/benchmark etc running in the background).
I know foobar con for 32-bit,I don;t know if they updated it for the 64-bit version.Do you know of any remote control that support Foobar 64 bit? I'm using Android...
Yes, but now do it again with something like Cinebench running in the background simulating 100% CPU load at the same time. And if you have a dedicated GPU, also do a measurement with something like Unigine Heaven benchmark running.Here you go:
View attachment 277014
Foobar off
View attachment 277015
foobar on
View attachment 277016
both
Identical.
I know foobar con for 32-bit,I don;t know if they updated it for the 64-bit version.
Already been done:Yes, but now do it again with something like Cinebench running in the background simulating 100% CPU load at the same time. And if you have a dedicated GPU, also do a measurement with something like Unigine Heaven benchmark running.
I imagine a properly designed and sufficiently isolated DAC will show no difference, but you never know. Certainly when I used to have my PC soundcard connected to my subwoofer over lineout (RCA), it would hum worse whilst I was playing a game and the PC was under high load (and the hum was sufficiently load that I could hear it over the musics content).
Are you using ALSA or JACK?I don't use Windows, I use this player in Linux (but there is Windows version), I don't know if it's "audiphile" but it does exactly what the player should do and perfectly sends any high res (DSD etc) without resampling (if you want it) to the external USB connected topping in the "pure DAC" mode:
Strawberry Music Player
Strawberry is a music player and music collection organizer for Linux, macOS and Windows. It is aimed at music collectors and audiophiles. With Strawberry you can play and manage your digital music collection, or stream your favorite radios.www.strawberrymusicplayer.org
(and at the same time, in a Linux it doesn't require any not need complex settings for mpd and other stuff)
Are you using ALSA or JACK?
How much ya wanta bet?No, it won't.
I use Alsa, never saw the need to complicate the audio server with Jack.Are you using ALSA or JACK?
Even though ALSA is a low-level audio API it needs to properly configure and that's very much complicated as ALSA means a "Jungle" to me...How much ya wanta bet?
I use Alsa, never saw the need to complicate the audio server with Jack.
View attachment 277079
I would tell you about 1$ or so, since I already have the results before my eyes...How much ya wanta bet?