Ken1951
Major Contributor
Same answer as last time: Yes. Won't be changing anything until one of the AVRs dies or my trustworthy Adcom 555 Mk1 does.
Amazing headphone.I am completely satisfied with my office setup, my main (living room) setup and now my portable setup. I don't feel the need to improve anything else. I mainly use headphones in my office and the final upgrade there was getting the Sennheiser HD 800 S headphones. I just finished my portable setup with the Hiby R6 Gen 3 DAP.
I very much agree, great stuff. But yeah, if you feel M33 could use better parts I'd like to see your expression handling M10.Purifi and Dirac have pretty much stopped my perpetual upgrade cycle. The combination of low distortion, ample power, and digital room correction have given me everything I ever wanted.
The only thing more I could ask for is better build quality and materials in my NAD M33. If they made a super masters version with metal everything and top tier parts, I’d pay another $2k for it and never upgrade again.
Keeping everything crossed that the wink denotes irony/sarcasm.Of course the measurement boys will tell you there’s no point because once you get a SINAD of (pick a number) then everything will sound the same, but that’s because they don’t listen to their systems, they only measure them
More than a trifle oversimplified Tim.Voted ‘Yes But’ because this is a hobby, if I was ever thinking I couldn’t improve on what I had there would be no point, I could simply listen to my Sonus Bluetooth speaker and forget about it! Of course the measurement boys will tell you there’s no point because once you get a SINAD of (pick a number) then everything will sound the same, but that’s because they don’t listen to their systems, they only measure them… which in itself is a hobby too so live and let live!![]()
These days I wouldn't want to wager any money on that.Keeping everything crossed that the wink denotes irony/sarcasm.
Thank you. Sounds like an amazing system! Nicely down-to-earth in terms of component selection and optimised to truly get most out of it. Love it.I should clarify.. the strikeout were for fun
On my side I don't need to modernize or simplify the system. it is modern (as of 2024) and simple: AVR as the center of the system (2-CH and HT) and a DSP to control the subwoofers. Do not see the need and expanse for DLBC when MSO can do it for free (and a lot of research and work
). Is DLBC better than MSO, BTW?
So have I.Have dialed, painfully and slowly to a very high level of satisfaction but I can hear the limitations of my present transducers: LCR (LSR 308) do distort, audibly to me above 90 dB or SPL at the listening position.
The subwoofers, Dayton Audio SUB-1500 make strange , scary sounds when pushed to reproduce above 105 dB below 30 Hz.. They buzz and rattle and distortion is audible then...
The AVR is also rather old... It is a 2017~18 model, that I bough refurbished. not complaining about its performance and not in the camp of "separate sound bette".. but I wouldn't mind something like the Monoprice HTP-1 or for endgame, never to be replaced unless it fails or a Trinnov, yes... If I were to go in those directions, Class D amplifiers.. just because
For speakers, Revel F208 are strongly in consideration. If some Revel Salon 2 were to pass by, at a salacious price...
I do like active, I believe they can be better than passive. I live where there is no distribution or repair/support outlets for anything audiophile. OTOH, I can solder and diagnose and I do have backup amplifiers (Rotel 5-channel and a JBL Pro with 8 channels) ... So passive it will be.
Peace.
My setup is a smart TV with Spotify -> optical out into a Behringer DEQ2496 -> optical out into a pair of AVI ADM9.1s, which are volume and remote controlled active speakers.Yes but.
I love my speakers, I’ve had them for almost 15 years and in many ways they mean a lot to me. I’m afraid though they wouldn’t do very well on the ASR test bench. Which sometimes makes me wonder what different, more ASR approved speakers would bring me.I’d be curious to know what sort of improvements a pair of 2024 text book performance speakers would bring.
The TV is old and slow, the DEQ is amazing but rather ancient tech too, and the speakers don’t have a display which does compromise the useability a bit. One can learn to volume control by ear, but when there is no sound at all it can be quite a challenge to find out if the volume was turned all the way down, the wrong input was selected or the mute button was pressed, or a combination of the three. Replacing the DEQ with a modern, volume controlled DAC with PEQ and display would solve the latter two issues in one move, without increasing the box count. A new TV is on the wish list too, planned to happen this year.I’d also like to both modernize and simplify my setup even further.
It was a long journey with my UMIK and REW to reach this point but I must say I am now more than once amazed by the sound of my simple setup. It’s just three components that do everything - cable TV, video streaming and music streaming*. Every family member can operate it, and in every role it sounds wonderful to me.That said, I have now dialed in my setup to such a high satisfaction level, that I wouldn’t mind if it turned out to be my last one.
The SU-1 has USB, OPT and COA, what other inputs do you want?I'm satisfied and the only thing I would add is a another Dac. I have the SU-1 just want something bigger size and more inputs to look better in my rack.
Why AVR again?I voted 'No'.
As I'm still with my Sony system, Toshiba Boombox and LG DVD player.
Looking for a proper audio system.
Almost finalized for a stereo format, but then further search and research takes me towards the AVR route.