So it is the weekend and time for me to gather my thoughts
I have learnt so much from this thread and thats excatly why i started browsing this forum years ago as I am intrigued by the beleifs on here that go against most of ehat I have read in magazines and reviews over the years. So a big thank you to all of you who have contributed. I am not sure I am any further forward but I am definitely more informed.
I have learned that my speakers are fairly hard to drive and that they need a powerful amp to drive them properly, so in a way my speaker choice has limited my choice of amps.
The Devialet does a great job ......but yes thats maybe becasue I dont know any different as its the only amp I have ever paired them with.
In Amirs review of the D200 and in stereophile I think it was they did mention something about high frquencies
Could this be the reason why occasionaly when i crank the volume up the music can get a bit bright ? If so would the NAD not handle this better?
If i am totally barking up the wrong tree, then hey let me know.
Maybe you can understand why for someone like me who has always read magazine reviews and has always craved the step up to the next level of kit can get very confused about all of this. Even on this thread there are a few contradictions , some saying all amps sound the same clearly think that they dont.
Like I say I have always read reviews, forums etc and made decisons about purchases after doiny my own research. My last two big buys the Devialet and Speakers were made after home demos.
I may have spent a LOT more than i needed to but that does not really bother me if I am honest as owning something nice does appeal to me in some cases, but I want to make better more informed decisions in the future.
So getting back to the NAD M33 v my Devialet 200. Most on here think the NAD would be a suitable replacement, although most seem to think I dont need to change.
Most on here think I would hear no difference in the sound. Honest I would love to make that leapof faith , but I admit to finding it hard to do. Although I still may.
Then I throw in the dealer who could sell me the NAD, hey profit for him, but he literally told me my Devialet was a much better amp and that I would be taking a backward step. I mean he talked me out of what was a pretty certain sale at this point. Why?
You can see how for people like me this can be very very confusing.
I dont need the NAD to be better, I just need it to be no worse than what I have and a good match for my speakers. DIRAC is also an added benefit.
So those are my thoughts right now, still pondering