- Joined
- Dec 21, 2020
- Messages
- 2,307
- Likes
- 3,429
Go to https://www.audioholics.com/ and wait 10 seconds on the home page and a pop ad comes up where Gene wants to sell you advice for $200 an hour minimum. It's pretty crazy.How can i contact him?
Go to https://www.audioholics.com/ and wait 10 seconds on the home page and a pop ad comes up where Gene wants to sell you advice for $200 an hour minimum. It's pretty crazy.How can i contact him?
I'm partial to concentric drivers. So, I would go with the KEFs.Hi everyone, I recently wanted to upgrade my main speakers. My room is 15 square meters, and I am currently using a pair of jbl studio690 as the main speakers. Their sound is good, but I always feel that there is something missing when listening to music. The r7 meta is the cheapest among them. All three have very good measurement data. I don’t know how to choose. I hope to get your reply.
I haven't heard any of these speakers. Based however on the immense pleasure provided by my lowly JBL LSR 308 helped by a pair of subwoofers; those subwoofers are EQ and DSP's by miniDSP and MSO, REW, I would go with the Revel f226BE...I'm partial to concentric drivers. So, I would go with the KEFs.
The reason I like concentric drivers is that there is not a dip in the frequency response at the midrange/tweeter crossover point when I am not on axis vertically, which is an issue for speakers that are not concentric. Oftentimes I listen to music when I am not seated in my listening chair, so to me vertical off-axis response is important.
But, if the speakers are only going to be used when you are seated in your listening chair, then all three speakers should sound good based on their measurements (I have not heard them, though).
I agree that DSP is a game changer. I use a miniDSP Flex HTx in my family room, and just this morning got Camilla DSP implementing EQ/room correction for my office speakers. Both systems benefit significantly from DSP.with serious outboard DSP (mniDSP 2x4 HD + MSO and REW Software).
Similar road I went down, started with JBL-HDI3800 great sound reproduction and dynamics but too "focused" ->KEF (just not for my taste in my room, narrow dispersion maybe?)-> F226BE + 3 subs + miniDSP + MSO = Clean w/Dynamics of the JBL's + Wide stage. Simply awesome every time I turn the system on.I haven't heard any of these speakers. Based however on the immense pleasure provided by my lowly JBL LSR 308 helped by a pair of subwoofers; those subwoofers are EQ and DSP's by miniDSP and MSO, REW, I would go with the Revel f226BE...
Same family and same design philosophy.
I do like what a concentric driver brings to the table but based on my experience with the earlier LS50 ... although these were set-up during my pre-ASR days..
still. I would go Revel plus serious subS, with serious outboard DSP (mniDSP 2x4 HD + MSO and REW Software).
Peace.
Please post in English going forward. ThanksDSP在当今如此重要,我完全同意这一点。我非常喜欢 Dirac BC 之后的声音。
Too much importance is placed on DSP. It’s your last line of attack at fixing sound issues. Because it’s so easy to use, folks consider it the to be one of the first things to do. From my review of the JBL, “With room correction/eq, I could not get these JBLs to work for me because room correction, despite it's name, does not correct anything with the room.”I'm very sorry. After typing the reply by hand, I was using the browser's translation to check the semantics. After checking that it was correct, I clicked send. This is the original reply: DSP is so important in nowadays and I couldn't agree more. I really like the sound after Dirac BC.
I agree that DSP is the last step in the process of getting everything properly setup, and other issues first should be addressed, but I disagree that there is too much importance placed on it.Too much importance is placed on DSP. It’s your last line of attack at fixing sound issues. Because it’s so easy to use, folks consider it the to be one of the first things to do. From my review of the JBL, “With room correction/eq, I could not get these JBLs to work for me because room correction, despite it's name, does not correct anything with the room.”
Thank you for your suggestion.I think i'll love Revel too.The problem is there is no place for me to listen to F226,I guess i just have to buy it myself.Save money from now.I just had the JBL HDI3800 and Revel F206 in my room. I preferred the Revels.
If you’re comparing a studio 690 (step down from the HDI 3800) to a Revel F226 (step up from the F206), then my vote easily goes to the Revel. However, I have not heard the KEF or Perlisten. They could be fantastic. It behooves you to go listen to these before choosing.
I always thought this was a little tacky, no?Go to https://www.audioholics.com/ and wait 10 seconds on the home page and a pop ad comes up where Gene wants to sell you advice for $200 an hour minimum. It's pretty crazy.
You can check Spinorama.org for comparing measurements.
Revel F226be
Tonality: 5.6
Bass extension: 46Hz
Flatness: ±1.2dB
Measurements for speaker Revel F226be
www.spinorama.org
KEF R7 Meta
Tonality: 7.0
Bass extension: 32Hz
Flatness: ±1.7dB
Measurements for speaker KEF R7 Meta
www.spinorama.org
Perlisten R5t
Tonality: 7.3
Bass extension: 29Hz
Flatness: ±1.9dB
Measurements for speaker Perlisten r5t
www.spinorama.org
Personally I would choose between the KEF R7 Meta and Perlisten R5t. And a tough choice between them!