It looks magnificent! Congrats! Great effort!
Thanks for saying so, much appreciated.It looks magnificent! Congrats! Great effort!
For QRDs the distance needs to be 3x the minimum design wavelength, which limits me to the back wall (behind the LP).Which spot are you planning on treating with the diffuser, the front wall?
Totally, it's the same concept / design but probably with a different process of building it. I wonder how much they cost... the wood one is 300Kg LOLCool project! Reminds me of these:
Skyscraper 101/101 - acoustic manufacture
www.acousticmanufacture.com.pl
Dyfuzor Skyscraper 73/183 wood - acoustic manufacture
www.acousticmanufacture.com.pl
Why? High freq require smaller wells. I guess there is a practical limit on well depth to well area.It's said that wells smaller than 2.5cm x 2.5cm will cause loss of high frequencies...
According to the Cox / D’Antonio book wells with width of less than ~2.5cm suffer from viscous losses which tends to affect high frequencies the most. I think this could be desirable in some rooms, but then you have a less predictable mix of diffusion / absorption... I think above that width you simply get diffusion without significant absoprtion. The measurements in my room seem to show that, roughly.Why? High freq require smaller wells. I guess there is a practical limit on well depth to well area.
Famous Blackbird Studio C is a nice example (not very practical nor affordable though). Ceiling panels are partially with additional high freq diffuser.
View attachment 395396
All good?