I am gonna go out on a limb and say your measurements trace closer to Genelec's own than Amir's do.
View attachment 130933
Well, splitting hairs really!
Mine shows more energy in the low mids, amirs has that little bump in the mids.
One thing I've noticed (or at least I think so, as I've not investigated in depth) is that highly curved baffles are more sensitive to speaker stands and positioning on them than rectangular speakers. In this case I measured the Genelec on its included isopod stands, but that causes a bit of a gap between the speaker and the stand that I think introduces a few small reflections. I don't think I saved those measurements, but during the initial setup I did think I saw small variations in the mids depending on how I positioned it in on the stand. I found a similar thing with the Devialet Phantom Reactor, which showed a rather noticeable dip
I wonder if it's because the curved baffle just acts like one big waveguide and then the sound gets 'interrupted' by a flat surface like a stand. We saw with
@hardisj's measurement of the KEF R3 how some very small changes can make noticeable differences to the frequency response. In this case I don't imagine it's particularly audible,but it could be intersting to investigate further.
At some point I plan on getting a few different speaker stands and measuring the effect they have on the frequency response. Can't be very high resolution data due to the limitations of the quasi-anechoic method, but I am beginning to think that different stands can affect a speaker's sound a small amount for more than just speaker height.