I figured by now a Wikipedia author would have taken notice of ASR and made a Wiki on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation
He was a Teddy Bear?
No, a toy car.He was a Teddy Bear?
He was a Teddy Bear?
Go for it.
... and this is a problem why?I figured by now a Wikipedia author would have taken notice of ASR and made a Wiki on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation
Not a problem that there isn't a Wiki. ASR is established now and would benefit from a Wiki by increasing it's reputation and providing some details for peeps web browser search results.... and this is a problem why?
Not a problem that there isn't a Wiki. ASR is established now and would benefit from a Wiki by increasing it's reputation and providing some details for peeps web browser search results.
Yeah. I was already thinking about if or how to address that stuff in a Wiki. It's a major part of ASR so it should have a entry.Just make sure you add plenty of references to "cult", "dogma" and the like with some dubious references in the footnotes to the more antagonistic elements of other audio forums. That will be fun.
I hope my sarcasm came through loud and clearYeah. I was already thinking about if or how to address that stuff in a Wiki. It's a major part of ASR so it should have a entry.
What , we feeling so sorry for @amirm we are now altering history to cover for his foul ups ?It was a good device, perhaps better than contemporary iPods. My old man used one for years.