- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
- Messages
- 4,340
- Likes
- 6,714
Yeah, it was, that initial remark, but only in parts, maybe. Only that I responded, that my question (requirement) wasn't about "resonances" but about just humble broad-band deviations--as I said initially. You towed the topic on Your terrain, namely what is written somewhere, so You could defend Your standpoint referring to some authority, namely Toole in this case.
Of course my question isn't answered yet. You say: "Read the book!" I say: "It is exactly because it is not considered in the book / model." You say: "Resonances are." I say: "What the heck …?"
Where do you find Toole's book/research to be inadequate? Also, what is your experience? You seem very well informed.