The better the amp´s transformer (lower impendance), the lower the difference between peak and continuous power, so for me a quality issue.
Some unsolicited background
The reason why I looked into the whole issue of max. amp. power was the desire to define a point on the pre amp volume pot scale (at 2 o´clock position in this case, leaving 12dB more preamp gain), where serious distortion will occur.
For that purpose I created a test signal with L/R alternating 400Hz bursts (20% duty cycle and L, R shifted ).
That leaves the thermal load on the bass/mid speakers at a decent level and has only little high frequency content to protect the tweeters. The nice thing about this signal is the easily audible detection of clipping.
Compared to a continuous sine wave on both channels there was little difference in vol. pot position, when clipping occured, which speaks for the amp´s (PSU) quality in my opinion.
Neglecting some 1dB DAC-oversampling-output-level overshoot from already clipped music tracks or the 5-10% variation in mains voltage, I can be relatively sure not to overdrive the system and maintain highest possible fidelity, when listening loud (e. g. for just a few old Yello tracks)...or very high dynamic performances (e. g. ECM´s Il Pergolese).
That entirely depends on the amp circuit design, you can't just conclude this from transformer size. Again It's mostly irrelevant with real music because of the very large ratio between rms and peak levels.
The thing that's going to break are most likely your tweeters, so this test was not very useful, especially if you did it by ear without measurements.