Your profile says you've been here since August. Yet you seem surprised and unaware of the ethos of this forum.
There are dozens of forums where claims of difference like yours about are par for the course, and welcomed and seconded without question.
This forum was specifically founded to be different from that, to be focused on science and the use of testing and measurement to develop true claims about audio. (Testing includes : listening tests) Claims that don't seem credible in light of known science and engineering are going to be challenged.
And here you are, making a dubious claim, then telling us how to be more appealing after we explain why your claim is dubious, and ask for better evidence.
One last time and I hope a return to sanity .
What I claimed is my personal experience and not a research paper and I did not presented it as an absolute truth . It was a simple response to a topic question . Where in the forum rules says specifically that I need to provide logs of tests in order to be able to express an experience?
You can counter with arguments to challenge but demanding for me to take a test to prove it is irrelevant and disturbing.
If I hear or think I hear a difference has nothing to do with the fact that the compression of aac256 is not transparent to 100% of people dependent on individual and equipment . Information is lost . Fidelity exists when information stays intact.
Therefore what I hear does not affect the above truth even if this truth applies for a minuscule percentage of people.
If you are curious to know specifically about me then you can ask me and if I want I will do the test and provide the results. Under no f.king circumstance am I obliged to do it.
I hope logic prevails into your mind.