I don't mean to come off as crass, but I wonder if people are just trolling me, or if my point is not being understood.
Using your example, would your company, knowing they can't get the Siemens components, announce a new project to begin or be completed in 3 weeks (or any unrealistic time frame)? It seems logical that if you knew there was a supply chain issue, you would not, or you would set a realistic date to begin, or complete the project.
Hobie says "brand new product, available in 2-3 weeks". There's no benefit in doing so if it's not going to be available. These aren't crowd funded amps. There's no pre-order. There's no financial benefit for them being announced as available in 2-3 weeks, if they will not be available for a year.
At the end of the day, none of this discussion matters as it will not make the amp more readily available. Some in this thread just want to die on their hill of false equivalency to place no blame on Monoprice. Whoever gave the green light to say the amps would be available in 2-3 weeks is squarely to blame for an unrealistic time frame, regardless if it is component related, production related, styrofoam packing related, cardboard shipping box related, etc. All of this would have been ordered and delivered and built well before Hobie said 2-3 weeks in the video. That's my only point.