£11k for what is effectively a broken designThis brand is a joke.

£11k for what is effectively a broken designThis brand is a joke.
Or they don't need to in order to sell?Why can’t they just design a better speaker is it because,
they don’t know how to
they choose not to
they just don’t give a fig either way ?
Keith
So do I, and they always sounded like garbage, regardless of the cost.note I have heard the Borresen multiple times at shows
Børresen never disappoint.
For many reasons, he can't be too "divisive" or brittle.I'm really losing interest in Erin's reviews. He doesn't seem as comfortable labeling broken speakers for what they are. So many issues he points out and falls back on "I didn't like this but you might like it". Nah, no one is going to like to massive peaks in the bass or resonances. He used to be so much more critical of crappy speakers.
He probably just didn't want to piss off the very kind person who bought them and drove them half way across the USA to have them measured.I'm really losing interest in Erin's reviews. He doesn't seem as comfortable labeling broken speakers for what they are. So many issues he points out and falls back on "I didn't like this but you might like it". Nah, no one is going to like to massive peaks in the bass or resonances. He used to be so much more critical of crappy speakers.
That's how I see it. The data is brutal, it's presented in full, it speaks for itself, he doesn't need to pile on.He probably just didn't want to piss off the very kind person who bought them and drove them half way across the USA to have them measured.
He was being polite.
While it's understandable, we also have to say the obvious that it's not a total honest review when the truth isn't clearly shared. He easily heard the anomalies and shortcomings in the AB tests. No one will prefer this kind of response (and other issues related to phase) in the long run with various music material. The speaker is really broken and it should be said so. Price is also ridicolous.He probably just didn't want to piss off the very kind person who bought them and drove them half way across the USA to have them measured.
He was being polite.
$11,000 for passive speakers should really merit substantially better performance than that, especially considering you'll need to tack on an amplifier of decent quality (so another thousand dollars)...Price is also ridicolous.
I think it’s fair to say I liked the X3s from Børresen a great deal and I do think they set the current standard for speakers (that I’ve heard) at this price, and I do think in that respect they could well be seen as game-changers
I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the Børresen X3 loudspeakers are fully deserving of HiFi PiG’s top award. They are superb!
The Børresen X3s may be svelte in appearance and this clearly helps in terms of imaging and resolution but what really struck me was the power of bass that they can reproduce.
The X3s made it very easy to hear what various filters and cables were doing in the streaming system, but they also made The God in Hackney’s The World in Air Quotes sounds magnificent. Room filling scale, powerful dynamics and subtle timing cues were all in evidence alongside the majesty of tracks like ‘Bardo!’.
With more complex pieces you get a real sense of being able to hear through the mix, this was apparent with Patricia Barber’s ‘Post Modern Blues’ which can seem slightly thick and opaque with some loudspeakers, as if it has been mixed to sound plush on brighter systems. Here you get solid precise double bass and drums alongside the vitality and power of the piano, the whole unit is as sharp as a knife but there is depth of tone and body to the sound. It’s a thrilling combination especially when the bass goes so far down, the double bass in particular being extremely articulate and fast.
Standing on their own four feet the Børresen X3s represent excellent value both in terms of sound and build quality, which given where they are made is quite an achievement.
I don't agree.While it's understandable, we also have to say the obvious that it's not a total honest review when the truth isn't clearly shared. He easily heard the anomalies and shortcomings in the AB tests. No one will prefer this kind of response (and other issues related to phase) in the long run with various music material. The speaker is really broken and it should be said so. Price is also ridicolous.
He is just being polite and don't want to insult the buyer. There are no studies on frequency response showing that people prefer this over a neutral response, quite the contrary.I don't agree.
He made it clear, to me at least, that it had big problems whilst saying some people may like the effect of the shortcomings, though he himself did not.
To say that nobody would prefer it is clearly wrong since not only did the person bringing them for evaluation pay for them plenty of other people do despite every test I have seen showing them to be technically very very bad indeed. It is odd that people like them and I think he was trying to evaluate what out of the blatant shortcomings anyone may like on audition whilst saying he did not. Except he liked the spectacularly bad bass on one track which is weird IMO.