Hi everyone, I'm pretty new to this forum and hope to get some honest advices or opinions here ![Wink ;) ;)]()
I'm planning to buy a new headphone amp and a dac.
My current headphones are:
- HifiMan HE400i
- Sennheiser HD 598
- AKG K530 limited edition
- Sony 1A
I'll probably go for something like the HD 660s from sennheiser next![Wink ;) ;)]()
I'm looking for a smooth and clean amp that does not highlight nor underrepresent any part of the audible bandwith, but most importantly not underrepresent the low end..I hate that haha
I had an Audio-GD R2R11 which I bought because many (in other forums and reviewers on youtube) have said that it's a brilliant amp/dac combo and probably the best under 500.
When I got the R2R I was extremely dissapointed with it, it sounded way worse than my ASUS D1 PC-soundcard. The only thing it did better was volume, although the sound got even worse the louder I played it. It sounded squashed and had no punch/low end. So I sold it
For the DAC I'll most probably go with the Topping E30.
I'm yet a bit unsure for the AMP.
I'll either go with the Schiit Asgard 3, the Magni Heresy or the 3+.
I know the Heresy measures really good, better than the 3+, the Asgard 3 sadly wasn't measured yet.
I also know from years of experience in Hifi (worked in a Hifi shop) that bad measuring stuff always sounds bad, but something that measures just good enough, can sometimes sound better than something that measures exceptionally well (subjectively).
A good exemple are Amps from Cambridge audio like the 851 and something like the M3 from Musical fidelity. The 851 measures better and even consists of better and more substantial components....but just sounds lifeless and weak with about any loudspeaker me and my former collegues have tried it with. The M3 somehow always sounded smooth, a little warm and had really handled the low end and subbass like a champ.
Back to headphone amps, I read some reviews where the Magni 3+ is described as smoother and with more "body" and "weight" in the low end than the Heresy. Measurewise the 3+ is also good enough I guess.
Since the first time reviewers and other forums made me buy the worst audio gear I have ever owned, I don't want to make the mistake of trusting their (seemingly completely bad) hearing abilities and evaluations again.
I'd really appreciate any opinions on this, maybe someone owns one or two of these and cares to explain some differences in sound between the them.
I don't want to end up with a lifeless, robotic and flat (in a bad way) sounding amp (Heresy) nor with a muddy or worse one that is described as better (3+)...or one that is described as all around better (Asgard 3), but probably is the worst of the three, each as described by people who might not be able differentiate between good sound and something like the R2R 11![Wink ;) ;)]()
I'm planning to buy a new headphone amp and a dac.
My current headphones are:
- HifiMan HE400i
- Sennheiser HD 598
- AKG K530 limited edition
- Sony 1A
I'll probably go for something like the HD 660s from sennheiser next
I'm looking for a smooth and clean amp that does not highlight nor underrepresent any part of the audible bandwith, but most importantly not underrepresent the low end..I hate that haha
I had an Audio-GD R2R11 which I bought because many (in other forums and reviewers on youtube) have said that it's a brilliant amp/dac combo and probably the best under 500.
When I got the R2R I was extremely dissapointed with it, it sounded way worse than my ASUS D1 PC-soundcard. The only thing it did better was volume, although the sound got even worse the louder I played it. It sounded squashed and had no punch/low end. So I sold it
For the DAC I'll most probably go with the Topping E30.
I'm yet a bit unsure for the AMP.
I'll either go with the Schiit Asgard 3, the Magni Heresy or the 3+.
I know the Heresy measures really good, better than the 3+, the Asgard 3 sadly wasn't measured yet.
I also know from years of experience in Hifi (worked in a Hifi shop) that bad measuring stuff always sounds bad, but something that measures just good enough, can sometimes sound better than something that measures exceptionally well (subjectively).
A good exemple are Amps from Cambridge audio like the 851 and something like the M3 from Musical fidelity. The 851 measures better and even consists of better and more substantial components....but just sounds lifeless and weak with about any loudspeaker me and my former collegues have tried it with. The M3 somehow always sounded smooth, a little warm and had really handled the low end and subbass like a champ.
Back to headphone amps, I read some reviews where the Magni 3+ is described as smoother and with more "body" and "weight" in the low end than the Heresy. Measurewise the 3+ is also good enough I guess.
Since the first time reviewers and other forums made me buy the worst audio gear I have ever owned, I don't want to make the mistake of trusting their (seemingly completely bad) hearing abilities and evaluations again.
I'd really appreciate any opinions on this, maybe someone owns one or two of these and cares to explain some differences in sound between the them.
I don't want to end up with a lifeless, robotic and flat (in a bad way) sounding amp (Heresy) nor with a muddy or worse one that is described as better (3+)...or one that is described as all around better (Asgard 3), but probably is the worst of the three, each as described by people who might not be able differentiate between good sound and something like the R2R 11