• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Watches in the 21st Century

That one looks cool, @Doodski...
But I would have liked the looks much better if it did not 'advertise' that it was 'solar-powered' on its face.
Something about solar-powered watches that just don't do it for me! :(
They are not as bad as those other "active" watches, requiring battery changing/charging, yet; me no likey! :confused:
What about if it said. "Automatic?" well dangit... Here's 2 watches that I like and keep in mind my up close night vision sucks so that's why I like the glowing stuff.
watch 1.png

watch 2.png
 
I still haven't actually worn my $150 Seagull "1963" purchased via AliExpress, but it's nicely detailed for the price. I imagine that I'd really love the detailing on an A. Lange & Soehne wristwatch, but I'd hate to see such a finely finished timepiece accumulate the inevitable signs of wear and tear.
OT?
Metallurgy?
Germans?
Italians?
Japanese?
Swiss?

Sorry that you'd be totally wrong by choosing any of those countries as TopDogs in metallurgy.
None even holds a candle to the newly-gained technology and capabilities of what the Chinese can produce with impressive precision in machining them to whatever!
 
It has come time for a Start-Clock change in Formula 1.:(
202410_F1ClockChange02.jpeg

The old time-standard Rolex is splitting the scene.
Swiss luxury brand LVMH is supposed to have signed a 10year dealio w/LibertyMedia (<<took over F1, circa 2017).
LVMH's Tag/Heuer is to become the 'Official' F1 time-keeper at a cost of around $110Billion, per year.

OT: I dare you to call the above OT!;)
 
It has come time for a Start-Clock change in Formula 1.:(
View attachment 396375
The old time-standard Rolex is splitting the scene.
Swiss luxury brand LVMH is supposed to have signed a 10year dealio w/LibertyMedia (<<took over F1, circa 2017).
LVMH's Tag/Heuer is to become the 'Official' F1 time-keeper at a cost of around $110Billion, per year.

OT: I dare you to call the above OT!;)
Heuer has a long history of F1 involvement, right back to when Jack Heuer traded timing equipment with Ferrari in return for putting Heuer patches on their driving suits. They also sold watches to the drivers at cost, and the drivers sold them on for profit.

file-786E9993-76E6-49EB-BBF9-451E9D7BDA17-1288-000001F130FECF69.JPG


Rick “1963 Carrera Re-Edition” Denney
 
What about if it said. "Automatic?" well dangit... Here's 2 watches that I like and keep in mind my up close night vision sucks so that's why I like the glowing stuff.
View attachment 396238
View attachment 396239

I'm not familiar with that brand, but all my watches are quartz, solar. I have a couple of Citizens, that must be over 20 years old now, still running just fine, although I don't think one of them is still fully waterproof.

I also have three watches that are solar and radio controlled, so you set your time zone and they adjust themselves and are always correct; unless you travel and change time zones, you don't need to do anything. It's quite odd to see three watches that you haven't altered since the day you got them, perfectly synchronised and correct. :)
 
I'm not familiar with that brand, but all my watches are quartz, solar. I have a couple of Citizens, that must be over 20 years old now, still running just fine, although I don't think one of them is still fully waterproof.

I also have three watches that are solar and radio controlled, so you set your time zone and they adjust themselves and are always correct; unless you travel and change time zones, you don't need to do anything. It's quite odd to see three watches that you haven't altered since the day you got them, perfectly synchronised and correct. :)
For me, depending on the built infrastructure to keep the time isn't as interesting. I'm not arguing the efficacy, but for me watches are a hobby and the interesting part is making something self-contained that works at such high levels of accuracy.

My father's solar Seiko is often stopping because it's hard to store it where it will get enough light, and I don't wear any watch for more than a week or two at a time before changing to something else in the collection. I keep forgetting to put it in the windowsill to stay charged. I like it for workouts--it's impervious to sweat and doesn't claw a hole in my arm when running the way some of my watches will.

Rick "whose first good watch was an LED-display Hamilton QED" Denney
 
For me, depending on the built infrastructure to keep the time isn't as interesting. I'm not arguing the efficacy, but for me watches are a hobby and the interesting part is making something self-contained that works at such high levels of accuracy.

My father's solar Seiko is often stopping because it's hard to store it where it will get enough light, and I don't wear any watch for more than a week or two at a time before changing to something else in the collection. I keep forgetting to put it in the windowsill to stay charged. I like it for workouts--it's impervious to sweat and doesn't claw a hole in my arm when running the way some of my watches will.

Rick "whose first good watch was an LED-display Hamilton QED" Denney
I don't wear watches much anymore. I did for almost my entire life until retirement. I have a Citizen Eco-Drive solar as my last conventional every day watch. I purchased one of those little LED light boxes. Barely larger than the watch. I sits on the watch and keeps it charged. I too for a couple years had to keep it on the window sill every so often. Now it is always charged so on the occasion I do wear it I don't have to think about it.
 
Some smart watches need charging everyday, but not all.
I have no desire of ownership but I do like lurking at aliexpress, and window-shop for new e-Gizmoz.
I have been noticing that they are offering many smart-watches for under $50.
I am forced to assume that there must have been "epic floods"... recently in Chinese marketplace.
I have been tempted to purchase one; JUST to see wutup... but my bucket-list does not include carrying e-Gizmos.
It will probably end up in my trash-bucket within a month, after my curiosity wanes off!:confused:
 
I have no desire of ownership but I do like lurking at aliexpress, and window-shop for new e-Gizmoz.
I have been noticing that they are offering many smart-watches for under $50.
I am forced to assume that there must have been "epic floods"... recently in Chinese marketplace.
I have been tempted to purchase one; JUST to see wutup... but my bucket-list does not include carrying e-Gizmos.
It will probably end up in my trash-bucket within a month, after my curiosity wanes off!:confused:
I notice in reviews many of those have apps you have to download to use them. Not uncommonly those apps may charge your account without telling you or have other invasive unasked for features. Or so some of the reviews say.

Now some a little above the $50 mark, say $100-150 offer features similar to watches going for 3 or 4 times that. Apparently they work, maybe a tiny bit less accurately, but not terribly. Some number don't last long vs mainstream brands. I don't know that is a big problem. Smart watches are still changing somewhat. If I buy one for $150 use it 2 years and try another that doesn't seem worse than buying one for $450 with the same features that last 5 or 8 years while being out of date before then.
 
For me, depending on the built infrastructure to keep the time isn't as interesting. I'm not arguing the efficacy, but for me watches are a hobby and the interesting part is making something self-contained that works at such high levels of accuracy.

To clarify, it doesn't need to receive a radio signal to work, you can set the time manually, the signal will just keep it up to date, if you want it to. Even without radio correction, as a quartz watch, it will still be far more accurate than most mechanical/automatic watches.

Some of the top quality quartz movements can achieve an accuracy of +/- 1 second a year, and even a fairly cheap ones can achieve +/- 15 seconds a month, whereas a +/- 5 seconds a day is good for a mechanical watch. :)
 
I be no expert but you have to stop looking at those tritium watches so much.:oops:
I hope they are not View attachment 397450
Well of course it's radioactive, but the tritium + fluorescent material is sealed in tiny glass capsules. CoPilot says that it's a low-level beta emitter and harmless to humans, and that said particles don't penetrate the glass. Timex used to do something similar with very inexpensive watches, and they glowed great.
 
Well of course it's radioactive, but the tritium + fluorescent material is sealed in tiny glass capsules. CoPilot says that it's a low-level beta emitter and harmless to humans, and that said particles don't penetrate the glass. Timex used to do something similar with very inexpensive watches, and they glowed great.
I like the glowing stuff because my eyes are not the best in the dark and Timex siphoned about $300 out of me in the past 5 years for garbage watches that have irreplaceable straps, no battery changes possible etc. So Timex is on my, "No-Go List." This time I buy stainless steel or carbide coated stainless steel watch and strap and get a decent movement and either solar or 5 to 10 year battery support with a Swiss movement.
 
Well of course it's radioactive, but the tritium + fluorescent material is sealed in tiny glass capsules. CoPilot says that it's a low-level beta emitter and harmless to humans, and that said particles don't penetrate the glass. Timex used to do something similar with very inexpensive watches, and they glowed great.
It was meant to be a joke for @Doodski... because he loves 'lit' watches so much!
During college, I had a tech-job for Phillips that used to make airport x-ray detectors. We all had to wear those dosimeter thingies attached to our badges.
4th month I was there, my badge registered slightly above the 'green' range...
TMI >> I quit!
 
Wild thing about Ronda quartz movements is how cheap they are, yet IME, they're also very decent, although priced like a disposable item, they can be serviced, or at least my particular model can be. I suppose if paired with a big ole lithium coin cell, there's no reason it couldn't run for years. I replace my own batteries, though I probably ought to get a watch press for those pesky snap-on backs.
 
It was meant to be a joke for @Doodski... because he loves 'lit' watches so much!
During college, I had a tech-job for Phillips that used to make airport x-ray detectors. We all had to wear those dosimeter thingies attached to our badges.
4th month I was there, my badge registered slightly above the 'green' range...
TMI >> I quit!
I once had a student job doing basic maintenance of a Cobalt-60 food irradiator. It sure did glow pretty! Standard procedure was to grab a dosimeter before entering the room, and log readings before and after. I never saw any uptick, but nevertheless, my mom was super-relieved when I quit that job.
 
Back
Top Bottom