He did a similarly expensive kit for the Snell C/V. These speakers typically go for ~$1k or less on the used market (what I paid for mine), and he put together a kit that also costs $1k. Really mind blowing given that even if he used some really chunky coils in the crossovers I still can't get past 300~400 in parts, and of course since he won't give out parts lists or accept returns or publish measurements of the speakers that are trustworthy (or that even look worth the money assuming they are trustworthy) I really don't understand how people can bring themselves to give money to this guy. It's just insulting
to be perfectly balanced here, I will say that while the C/V is a great speaker by most accounts that measured very well for it's day by Atkinson, it is odd that the woofers are in series in the original topology and the speaker's efficiency suffers as a result. Surely the crossover design could be improved given current measurement abilities and knowledge, but then you run into a second problem- 1990's era Peerless polypropylene mids and woofers. Good in their day but with their cone flex and lack of detail is it really worth it to even bother putting another 1k into these things? The wide flat baffles lacking any dispersion control except for some factory applied felt can't compete with modern speakers using computer-engineered waveguides, and it shows in the measurements. It is interesting to think of the C/V as Voeck's prototype for his current towers from Revel. Things like the Performa series basically share the topology of the C/V but with updated components and engineering solutions across the design, and again it shows in the measurements. So best case for GR the question becomes, a pair of new Performa3 F208's for ~$5k or a pair of 30 year old Snell's for $2k plus labor.