It's why I asked. As far as I know multigrounding creates risk for loops and another path for surges to enter the house. Not supposed to have a separate rod for a subpanel, for example.
Having separate grounds all connected to 1 place VS separate grounds connected to separate places are different things right?
You are right as were others earlier in that the NEC says ground must be at service entrance, wherever the main service disconnect is. After that, all grounds should connect (back) to the ground in the main service disconnect.
Both of mine go straight to the outside main disconnect. And the inside main panel is setup like a sub panel; 4 wire (2xmain, neutral and ground) is run from outside main disconnect to the panel. A combined meter outside & disconnect was a small incremental price increase and I can now completely turn off power to the panel when I need to work on it.
This actually spurred me to look outside again. I knew the last cable installer put in a ground I didn't like, but now I realize that either it's non functional or that system is double grounded to (kind of) separate places... that all finally connect so not a huge deal?
Red is original ground for cable (internet), green is 'new' one, you can see their connections with the green and red arrows. It's difficult to see if the green one at the box is even doing anything, the box was originally pained, and painted again with the house paint. I doubt the took the time to scrape all of that off.
For reference, purple is (continuous line through the grounding block) from ground rods to main disconnect. Yellow is from water line to mains disconnect.
Looking at that cable install again, I really hate our last cable installer.
There's a reason I do most of my own work.