Answering questions about the DAILY DRIVE BADD GT (I'm copying & pasting the Novitec):
just to understand, how do you upload a video? thanks
Thank you!!You click on the "media" link (located between the "smiley" icon and the "double quotes" icon in my case) and paste a link from Youtube. From Youtube I did click on "share" to get a link and I paste that link in the "media" popup.
Or you can do it all manually, by creating the MEDIA tag yourself. But I take it the easiest is just to copy/paste a Youtube link in the "media" popup.
Tis is actually my all time favorite car (with a proper SuperPerformance of the Shelby Daytona a .001 of a second behind it.This BADD Ford GT is something else altogether but that said my not-out-of-reach dream is a GT 40 from Superformance / Safir: these dudes were smart enough to buy the "GT 40" name (when Ford was too stupid too sell it) as well as the original tooling. Some are going to nitpick that this or that replica are closer to the original but as I don't have the $3 milion or more for an original, I'll go for a Superformance. Moreover they are road legal (AFAIK only the Mark III Ford GT40 from the late 60s/early 70s were street legal, while the Mark I and Mark II were not road legal?).
FWIW I fell in love with the GT 40 in the nineties when I saw the old "Le Mans" movie, from 1971, by (and with) Steve McQueen.
It's even less practical than my old 1988 Porsche Carrera (which I used for five years straight as a daily anyway) but I do really dig impractical car.
No telemetry. No nothing. Just a 40 inches tall road legal race car from the sixties and that's it. Modernity is overrated.
I've got other inaccessible dream cars but a Superformance GT 40 is something I'm really considering. I'm in Europe and by chance there's a shop importing them not too far from where I live (about a one hour drive).
The red one is drool worthy...
The red one is drool worthy...
That would be my DAILY driver UNLESS I had to tow something or were going further off-road than in the picture (I am frequently doing both at the same time).One of my toys. View attachment 394987
That would be my DAILY driver UNLESS I had to tow something or were going further off-road than in the picture (I am frequently doing both at the same time).
That's really light for a Porsche. My MX-5 RF is ~2500lbs but is street-friendly.Both are fun cars. The red one, it’s pretty hard edged, took about 400lbs of weight off it (weights about 2600 lbs), and the chassis has zero rubber in it, has pretty aggressive multiple adjustment shocks, so it’s very, very direct and responsive. I did keep the AC, though. And it works. It’s stupid fun in the canyons. Enough power to be fast (it’s measured 265 at the wheels, it’s a lightly massaged ‘mostly stock’ 3.6), it’s small, and super agile chassis.
Mazda's red metallic is the best of all auto makers (for me).
That's really light for a Porsche. My MX-5 RF is ~2500lbs but is street-friendly.
Back in 1984 I had built a VW Beetle that was lowered 2" (lowering spindles in the front), had KYB's on all 4 corners, Heim-Joint anti-sway bars & the engine/trans mounts where steel. It weighed 1780 LBs. (full of fuel but no one in it). I used a 3 puck ceramic clutch that had the disengaged/engaged effect of a light switch. I built the engine from 1584 CC to 1679 CC changed the cam & rocker ratios, used a pair of Weber 40 IDF carbs with 28MM venturies (It made 105 HP at the wheels [using a 255/60R 15 tire rear] {185/65R 15 on the front}). I built the transaxle with a 3.88 final, 3.55 1st (to get a higher sped out of 1st than the 3.80 original, to get closer in the torque curve to second), I changed second from 2.06 to 1.96 for the same reason (to be closer in the torque curve to third), third is normally a 1.26 but to be deeper in the torque curve after the shift, I changed it to a 1.41. For fourth I could no longer use the 0.89 overdrive because (with the large rear tires) it was to much of an RPM drop to allow any acceleration and the engine RPM/cooling fan speed was to slow to keep the engine cool for the power I was making, so it got changed to a 1.04 under drive.Both are fun cars. The red one, it’s pretty hard edged, took about 400lbs of weight off it (weights about 2600 lbs), and the chassis has zero rubber in it, has pretty aggressive multiple adjustment shocks, so it’s very, very direct and responsive. I did keep the AC, though. And it works. It’s stupid fun in the canyons. Enough power to be fast (it’s measured 265 at the wheels, it’s a lightly massaged ‘mostly stock’ 3.6), it’s small, and super agile chassis.