Adis
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2021
- Messages
- 152
- Likes
- 106
I can, it's 480 Hz.Do you think you could tell the pitch difference between 20480 and 20000 Hz?
I can, it's 480 Hz.Do you think you could tell the pitch difference between 20480 and 20000 Hz?
Yes, you see it as precisely 9 octaves.
Yet, I see it as arbitrarily 9.00 octaves. Why not 9.1 octaves, 8.5 octaves, etc. etc.?
We have different viewpoints, no?
Wouldn't 16Hz-16384Hz or 18-18432Hz be exactly 9 octaves? (another view)
Can you not accept the fact that another person can have a differing viewpoint? See my point?
Live and let live ... why must force another to your viewpoint ... and be intolerant of alternative viewpoint which is not wrong.
Disclaimer: before even attempting to reproduce this lower the volume output! It's quite literally driver sadomasuhism with wiping! And reason why it won't be a practice ever. I don't even know driver with Fs below 19 Hz and even getting to 23~24 is reserved for very big one's (15" or more) and with very large basket and magnets. Neadles to say not even 0.01% of people have such in their system.
Again please read disclaimer first and please do as I said. I won't be responsible for possible damage caused by doing otherwise!
Who likes take a look with analyser and see why I said whipping.
"Pitch is closely related to frequency, but the two are not equivalent. Frequency is an objective, scientific attribute which can be measured. Pitch is the subjective perception of a sound wave by the individual person, which cannot be directly measured."I can, it's 480 Hz.
Your point?"Pitch is closely related to frequency, but the two are not equivalent. Frequency is an objective, scientific attribute which can be measured. Pitch is the subjective perception of a sound wave by the individual person, which cannot be directly measured."
My point is that the usual meaning of "to be able to tell" is "to be able to perceive", not "be able to describe in numbers".Your point?
You said "difference", and " difference" is a result of subtraction. Works with numbers only.My point is that the usual meaning of "to be able to tell" is "to be able to perceive", not "be able to describe in numbers".
You said "difference", and " difference" is a result of subtraction. Works with numbers only.
You know, math...![]()
If you want to be that pedantic, then we only know you typed the difference, we don't know if you said (told?) it ;-)You said "difference", and " difference" is a result of subtraction. Works with numbers only.
You know, math...![]()
I stand corrected.If you want to be that pedantic, then we only know you typed the difference, we don't know if you said (told?) it ;-)
Really? A clear difference?Is something is a cat and another thing is a dog, there's a clear "difference". Your reductionism fails. No, the result of a subtraction is not the only valid definition of difference.
"difference - nounYou said "difference", and " difference" is a result of subtraction. Works with numbers only.
You know, math...![]()
""difference - nounReally? A clear difference?
So what's the difference between a cat and a dog?
Is it a mouse? Be clear, please!![]()
So the difference between a cat and a dog is a noun?""difference - noun
1 a: the quality or state of being dissimilar or different"
Difference is Aristotel, dragi Adise! We can discuss formal logic and it's boundaries including inheritance and doxa but it will end in semantics almost certainly at least regarding things being discussed.Really? A clear difference?
So what's the difference between a cat and a dog?
Is it a mouse? Be clear, please!![]()
That is an interesting use of the word "know".So the difference between a cat and a dog is a noun?
Thank you, now I know that.![]()
Difference is Aristotel, dragi Adise! We can discuss formal logic and it's boundaries including inheritance and doxa but it will end in semantics almost certainly at least regarding things being discussed.