Corrected a few errors in the last post.That helps, thanks.
Corrected a few errors in the last post.That helps, thanks.
Was the mini review deleted, I think it was quite interesting, his post in here and the other thread are gone?
...but the bigger it gets the harder it becomes preventing it from being a manufacturers advertisment platform that in turn controls what's said about products.
Besides it, the mini review is far more revealing than any of the so-called 'objective' measurements published here.
I joined just to point out the review/summary of deficiencies in components going missing miraculously is super shady. No offense to this place but the bigger it gets the harder it becomes preventing it from being a manufacturers advertisment platform that in turn controls what's said about products.
I noticed it went missing too. Did you post that review?I joined just to point out the review/summary of deficiencies in components going missing miraculously is super shady.
I noticed it went missing too. Did you post that review?
I bought D30pro instead (still Topping) because of that review and what it said about EX5 XLR outputs.Right now it really makes the impression like the big guy said to the other big guy: "I don't like this it hurts my sales, please remove this" and it disappeared.
I noticed it went missing too. Did you post that review?
Was the mini review deleted, I think it was quite interesting, his post in here and the other thread are gone?
That's my feeling too.
Besides it, the mini review is far more revealing than any of the so-called 'objective' measurements published here.
In addition, with such a disappearance, this topic seems to be aimed at praising the Ex5.
? Is it really going that direction again. The person was banned and had been banned several times on different accounts. The ban is issued by the moderator.Nope wasn't me. I feel as though if there were any false claims in the users post that got deleted, the guy who represents Topping here could have addressed it. The way it's gone down really gives the impression that somebody is burying negative press toward the product and really makes me question this place as a whole lately.
Your reply exactly shows the issue caused by such "review". Because it's mixed truth with implications and unanswered questions, you will only get confused instead of getting a good idea of how things are. The device is measured as shown in the review by Amir and Wolf. If you have any questions on the measurements you can simply ask.That could be but he didn't say that the product wouldn't perform, although he mentioned some less than good jitter measurements.
The person was banned and had been banned several times on different accounts.
The ban has little to do with what he said. Formerly banned member can't make a new account and come back. You may ask moderators for policies.Wouldnt it be just a case of replying "your measurements show x but here are other measurements, from different people" and then addressing the other point characteristics? I guess it is because of what u mentioned here:
Anyway I find it weird since he didn't actually bash the product in anyway, at least in my eyes, but its said and done.
Anyway I find it weird since he didn't actually bash the product in anyway, at least in my eyes, but its said and done.
With all due respect, you need to stay out of this one John or you may run the risk of tarnishing a rather stand-up reputation. You are not a moderator nor even a fellow forum member at this moment as in this particular case you would be regarded by many as being the manufacturer with having both a "bias" and "agenda" no matter how noble those may be. Please remember your place mate as this (these) type(s) of response(s) will only be misinterpreted and twisted against you. Use the "report" tool and allow the board owner, admins, and moderators to handle as accordingly.? Is it really going that direction again. The person was banned and had been banned several times on different accounts. The ban is issued by the moderator.
There's no need to address anything. All the said stuff are 20% truth 80% lie. Addressing them will only make uninformed people worry more. The design is tested to perform well without any issue in the real world. When the design doesn't match the expectation doesn't mean it bad or has potential issues. He simply couldn't understand.
Maybe you could read again? The explanations are only for the fact I didn't address his review.With all due respect, you need to stay out of this one John or you may run the risk of tarnishing a rather stand-up reputation. You are not a moderator nor even a fellow forum member at this moment as in this particular case you would be regarded by many as being the manufacturer with having both a "bias" and "agenda" no matter how noble those may be. Please remember your place mate as this (these) types of responses will only be misinterpreted. Use the "report" tool and allow the board owner, admins, and moderators to handle as accordingly.