• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SEAS KingRo4y MK3 Kit

samysound

Senior Member
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
374
Likes
333
Location
USA
Hi All

Wondering if any folks have experience or insight with this kit from SEAS. It uses the C18EN002/A coaxial unit and 10" sub (L26RO4Y ) with 3ch hypex plate amp with with DSP crossovers

http://www.seas.no/index.php?option...ro4y-mk-iii&catid=66:seas-diy-kits&Itemid=365

The built in amplification / DSP, sealed bass loading and form factor is appealing. I would use dirac as well to EQ in room. However the on and off-axis frequency response looks less smooth compared to what I have seen from offerings from Revel and KEF tested here on ASR. Figures below are lifted from the SEAS website:
1601070445456.png

1601070469196.png
 

Hemi-Demon

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2019
Messages
438
Likes
515
That woofer is wonderful, I have used it in a few truck audio applications due to its shallow depth. This is a pretty expensive DIY kit, when you are looking at darn near $3k once you factor in the enclosure costs. Looks amazing though off the spec sheet. The use of the DSP amp is awesome, since I am not the best at soldering crossovers. Have you bought the parts yet?
 
OP
S

samysound

Senior Member
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
374
Likes
333
Location
USA
That woofer is wonderful, I have used it in a few truck audio applications due to its shallow depth. This is a pretty expensive DIY kit, when you are looking at darn near $3k once you factor in the enclosure costs. Looks amazing though off the spec sheet. The use of the DSP amp is awesome, since I am not the best at soldering crossovers. Have you bought the parts yet?
Not yet, still in the contemplation stage (expensive indeed). Waiting for a quote from a local cabinet builder to see what prefabbed cabinets would run. I would really just be installing drivers and plate amps and loading the dsp.
 
OP
S

samysound

Senior Member
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
374
Likes
333
Location
USA
I just finished building a pair and all I can say wow. I don't have much in the way of comparison as I usually use headphones and these are my first pair of speakers that I've owned in 20 years that weren't cheap and nasty. My neighbours are going to hate me.
congrats! put up some pics if possible, when you get a chance.
 

sfdoddsy

Active Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2019
Messages
293
Likes
438
I've owned the C18 coaxes for a while and was using them in an open baffle with sealed bass units.

Really good sound. Up there with the KEF References I also owned.

One of these days I may build another baffle for them to replaced my current Neo 10/Neo 3s.
 

dtaylo1066

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
660
Likes
827
I heard them at RMAF a few years ago. I thought they sounded very good. I am not sure they sounded better than many other non-powered speakers I have heard. For the total cost of these drivers, Hypex amps and the limited passive components required, I think you could purchase a or build a very good amp and a number of fantastic non-powered speakers. But if you want it all in one package, this is a pretty good one. I did attend at the last RMAF a session by Andrew Jones rolling out the new at the time Elac Navis ARB51. It was stunningly good.
 

Wolf

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 21, 2020
Messages
572
Likes
611
Location
Indiana
I heard the previous version of the KingRoy kit with the last iteration of the Excel coax at AXPONA in 2013 I think. I didn't find them to be the absolute in transparency back then, but I'm assuming updates have been made such as the fully-amplified + DSP solution.

Then again, I find a lot of what I hear at those shows to basically just reaffirm my own chops. Some are good no doubt, but some are just not, and some are also terrible.
 

MrPeabody

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
945
Location
USA
I am somewhat familiar with both the 10" woofer and the coaxial driver, at least from the standpoint of having closely studied the specs for both on multiple occasions. But I don't recall seeing this particular kit before. Is it possibly a fairly new kit? I see that it is "Mk III", so there is potential for people to report experiences with one of the earlier versions, which experiences may or may not apply to the MK III.

I just tried to find the kit on Madisound, hoping not only to find it but also to find (no chance) that the kit includes the cabinets. It doesn't look like Madisound is selling this kit.

The woofer underwent some modifications in the not-very-distant past when Seas moved the manufacturing home from China. Vance Dickason put the new version through the wringer about a year and a half ago.

One of the more noteworthy facts about the woofer is that it is not optimized for use in a sealed enclosure. The Fs value is fairly low (26 Hz) and so also is the Qts value. The low Qts value is good from certain standpoints but it also means that the theoretical F3 value for the finished, sealed speaker will be somewhat high. Here, there is uncertainty because of the widely different values reported for Qts. The manufacturer's value is .27, which suggests a theoretical F3 value around 70 Hz. Dickason's measurement is higher, .38, which suggests a theoretical F3 value around 50 Hz. Either way, this is clearly a subwoofer driver meant to be used in a ported enclosure. However, with the EQ available with the Hypex amp, this will likely not be any concern.

The Qts value also affects the optimal enclosure size. Using the manufacturer's Qts and Vas values, the sealed enclosure can be as small as 1/4 cubic feet, which means that any enclosure large enough to physically contain the driver will be bigger than needed. If you use Dickason's values, the optimal sealed enclosure size is right around twice as large, i.e., .5 ft^3. The enclosure specified in the instructions are consistent with Dickason's values. I like sealed enclosures, but since you have to build the cabinet yourself anyway, I would give consideration to making the enclosure larger and making it a ported speaker with a low port tuning frequency, e.g., 25 Hz. (What I'd most likely do is follow the recommendations from the manufacturer and from Madisound for building a ported subwoofer with this driver.)

The only thing that jumps out at me as a possible concern is the unusually low crossover point at the handoff from the midrange driver to the tweeter, somewhere in the ballpark of 1.7 kHz. Anytime a tweeter this small is operated this low in frequency, there is the potential concern for tweeter distortion. The only measurements of distortion I've seen for this coaxial driver are the measurements taken by Troels Gravesen. I'm not familiar with the particulars of how he measures distortion, and with distortion measurements it is always a good idea to do comparisons with distortion measurements taken by the same person and using the same equipment, for other drivers. But Troels concluded that distortion was no concern for the tweeter if crossed over as low as 2 kHz. He worked up a passive crossover for the coaxial, using a slightly higher crossover point. Since the cabinets aren't included in the kit, one possibility that someone might consider would be to use his passive crossover, although this of course would be a very different approach making the speaker a passive speaker, in which case the design would not be complete until after having solved the crossover between the woofer and the midrange. (Evidently the crossovers in the kit are incorporated in the DSP files for the Hypex amplifier with DSP. I assume so because I didn't see any separate information about the specifics of the crossover.)

All in all this appears to be a very desirable speaker. Even though I identified a few potential deviations, I would be inclined to build it as intended, with a sealed enclosure and using the Hypex 3-way amp with DSP providing the crossover functionality and compensating for the inherent bass rolloff of the driver. For someone who doesn't prefer a self-amplified speaker, and who would have no difficulty with designing the woofer-midrange crossover, a passive approach using a ported enclosure and using Troel's midrange-tweeter crossover would also make for a very desirable speaker.

Someone who has built one of these ought to consider sending it to Amir for measurements. The distortion measurements would be especially interesting, in the 1.5 kHz to 2 kHz range in particular.
 

Jukka

Active Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
248
Likes
169
Since the cabinets aren't included in the kit, one possibility that someone might consider would be to use his passive crossover, although this of course would be a very different approach making the speaker a passive speaker, in which case the design would not be complete until after having solved the crossover between the woofer and the midrange. (Evidently the crossovers in the kit are incorporated in the DSP files for the Hypex amplifier with DSP. I assume so because I didn't see any separate information about the specifics of the crossover.)

The dsp file is downloadable from seas.no "Download DSP file" right above the picture. I guess you can open it up in demo mode in a Hyper Filter Designer, which is also free download.
 

Juhazi

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
1,725
Likes
2,910
Location
Finland
http://www.seas.no/images/stories/diykits/KingRO4Y_MK.III/KingRO4Y_MKIII_XoverGraph.jpg

Acoustic xo seem to be LR4, there should be no problem with 1,7kHz xo
Another version L26ROY has higher Fs and Qts if one likes that. But with dsp numbers are not so important... Making the box bigger up to standmount is not a problem. You can choose woofer height and cabinet volume as you like then.

I haven't heard KingROYs, but I'm familiar with SEAS coaxials, L26 and Hypex FA board. Super combination!
 

headshake

Active Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2019
Messages
297
Likes
238
I was curious about how seas setup the hypex filters for a sealed l26ro4y. I only labeled the big changes.

I was not expecting a shelf boost at 53hz. I guess I was just expecting boost/cuts other than the very low-end highpass at 17hz.
 

Attachments

  • seas_l26roy_kingroy_hypex.jpg
    seas_l26roy_kingroy_hypex.jpg
    595.9 KB · Views: 562
Last edited:

Juhazi

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
1,725
Likes
2,910
Location
Finland

diyhobby

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
22
Likes
7
Did any one make or hear the KingRoy besides the gentlemen posted above keen to hear feedback
 
Top Bottom