- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 7,337
- Likes
- 12,303
Absolutely, I certainly agree voodooless.
I know you are Dutch, and English is not your first language, so I don't want to hold you accountable as such, but people used to question others beliefs, now they hold them accountable (apparently!). I think this change in language from enquiry (why do you believe that?) to, what, accusation (how could you believe that!), makes Matt's point pretty well.That doesn’t mean I can’t keep those people accountable for whatever they believe, lie or not.
No, I mean accountable! I think that is pretty clear. If your belief is so strong that any criticism is met with indignation or worse, you should be held accountable for your foolishness. So yes, the question: “How could you believe that?” is a very valid one! I really don’t see a problem with that?I know you are Dutch, and English is not your first language, so I don't want to hold you accountable as such, but people used to question others beliefs, now they hold them accountable (apparently!). I think this change in language from enquiry (why do you believe that?) to, what, accusation (how could you believe that!), makes Matt's point pretty well.
Sure, questions is all one need generallyWell, you could be jumping to conclusions - question first, call to account later, maybe?
The unedited, unfiltered internet allows many people with bad reasoning and bad intent to express themselves who otherwise might not had their thoughts appear during the time of printed periodicals and other sorts of texts that would otherwise require editing.Probably a great deal more of the English language has changed to become unnecessarily combative over the last, say, 20 years or so.
It's getting better I think. Peeps are maybe becoming more aware of themselves in relationship to weirdOs on the internet and radicals.The unedited, unfiltered internet allows many people with bad reasoning and bad intent to express themselves who otherwise might not had their thoughts appear during the time of printed periodicals and other sorts of texts that would otherwise require editing.
Like this example of bad grammer fer'instance.
Data centres have been putting their cables on risers since forever. It is said to improve service levels and customer retention. Look at how high they elevate those cables:
View attachment 206225
I wasn't even aware we were talking about a man in particular It's more a "if the shoe fits, wear it" kind of thingFolks, please refrain from talking about the man and discuss the topic of his video.
Hello,Data centres have been putting their cables on risers since forever. It is said to improve service levels and customer retention. Look at how high they elevate those cables:
View attachment 206225
That is not the point of contention. The question here is why people think what they think, and whether that is a a reasonable stance?If a person truly believes in a false proposition and states that, is he lying, or just plain wrong?
But it has to be Important Water:You guys are all crazy. The only thing that works is suspending your cables in at least 30 cm of water
Water blocks a whole lot of RF, so your signal wil remain super clean
I believe that's called crucifixion.Oh, so that's why we've been doing this :
And then I wonder, would this work with people to reduce noise ?