Hi,
Here are some thoughts about the EQ.
Notes about the EQ design:
- The average L/R is used to calculate the score.
- The resolution is 12 points per octave interpolated from the raw data (provided by @amirm)
- A Genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the EQ.
- The EQ Score is designed to MAXIMIZE the Score WHILE fitting the Harman target curve with a fixed complexity.
This will avoid weird results if one only optimizes for the Score.
It will probably flatten the Error regression doing so, the tonal balance should be more neutral.- The EQs are starting point and may require tuning (certainly at LF).
- The range above 10kHz is usually not EQed unless smooth enough to do so.
- I am using PEQ (PK) as from my experience the definition is more consistent across different DSP/platform implementations than shelves.
- With some HP/amp combo the boosts and preamp gain need to be carefully considered to avoid issues
- Occluding IE devices generally must have very good fitting/seal in the user's ear canal for best performance.
please spend a few minutes to pick up the best ear tip... Best optimization you can make otherwise the FR/Score/EQ presented here are just worthless.- Just select the tip based on
1. more bass = better seal
2. More isolation from the outside world = better fit
3. Comfort
Very good L/R match.
I have generated one EQ, the APO config files are attached.
Score no EQ: 9.6
Score Armirm: 74.2
Score with EQ: 108.5
Code:Panasonic RP-TCM125-A APO EQ Score 96000Hz April252021-143033 Preamp: -9.7 dB Filter 1: ON PK Fc 161.7 Hz Gain -9.55 dB Q 0.33 Filter 2: ON PK Fc 889.5 Hz Gain 2.56 dB Q 0.92 Filter 3: ON PK Fc 4774 Hz Gain -5.25 dB Q 5.07 Filter 4: ON PK Fc 7063 Hz Gain 10 dB Q 2.51
View attachment 126147
Hey, looks like you are deep into this. So a strange question. If i would give you some PEQ settings for this iem's could you than make a plot fom this curve against the harmann curve?