- Joined
- Jan 3, 2021
- Messages
- 4,342
- Likes
- 13,579
Thanks for sharing VF. More of a Powered Mid-Woofer than a real Subwoofer. Why do I get Bose vibes from this?
Thanks for sharing VF. More of a Powered Mid-Woofer than a real Subwoofer. Why do I get Bose vibes from this?
It is, indeed. Initially it was suited to be paired with LS50 Meta/W2, that aren't bass monsters either. I guess it is fine for that purpose. But you clearly buy some lifestyle product instead of raw performance here. BTW, he will also review the SVS 3000 Micro (same vibe) soon.More of a Powered Mid-Woofer than a real Subwoofer.
Subwoofer comparisons are like comparing ones ***** size, it’s a delicate subject for many.What is it with subs that brings all these "you can get much more SPL cheaper, this is complete trash"-complaints.
to be honest i always see proud owners for the KF92, i saw 1 in room measurements and that thing go 20hz at 94dB in a FB groupWhat is it with subs that brings all these "you can get much more SPL cheaper, this is complete trash"-complaints. In almost all other categories people spend a few thousand more for example 4k€ for pair of Genelec 8331 and everybody is like "yeah, it's a bit steep but reasonable".
Disclaimer: proud owner of KF92 pair here. Yeah, they are overpriced, wouldn't recommend to anyone, but I liked the product and manufacturer, can afford them no problem and they have more oomph than I could ever need in my current apartment.![]()
to be honest i always see proud owners for the KF92, i saw 1 in room measurements and that thing go 20hz at 94dB in a FB group
This was the video? i didn't find the measurements, but 100dB 20hz is pretty much greatSounds about right for one. I think Shane Lee from youtube got about 100dB from 10-100Hz for two.
Oh, it's hard to find by searching.This was the video? i didn't find the measurements, but 100dB 20hz is pretty much great
You got me a bit lost. The first subwoofer released was the KF92, then the KC62 was released, right?I think it was better than expected, but still too small. Also we should considered the inroom gain in small rooms.
I guess the KF92 should be a lot better, but I'm still waiting for the KC92
The kc62 is newer, it come with the unicore thing +p-flex surround. KC is 6.5”x2 vs kf92 9”x2.You got me a bit lost. The first subwoofer released was the KF92, then the KC62 was released, right?
What are, size aside (that includes SPL and so on), the differences between the KF and the KC? I mean, adjustment and feature wise, the seem to be larger or smaller version of the same thing.
Nice i see is even 11hzOh, it's hard to find by searching.
8:26
Only the Kc62, its a newer thing only in the kc62 and ls60Doesn't the KF use a unicore structure and pflex too? The dual opposed drivers are quite evident...
Nice i see is even 11hz
He said the distance between the sub and he?
For music im pretty sure it can be louder than that, 11hz 94dB seems to be great
OK, forget about the cost. 80dB max output at 20Hz is not that impressive. I wouldn't recommend these Kefs to anyone who could fit a SVS SB1000 pro or bigger.What is it with subs that brings all these "you can get much more SPL cheaper, this is complete trash"-complaints. In almost all other categories people spend a few thousand more for example 4k€ for pair of Genelec 8331 and everybody is like "yeah, it's a bit steep but reasonable".
Disclaimer: proud owner of KF92 pair here. Yeah, they are overpriced, wouldn't recommend to anyone, but I liked the product and manufacturer, can afford them no problem and they have more oomph than I could ever need in my current apartment.![]()
Nope. Its doesn't.The KF perhaps may reach those numbers.