- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Messages
- 1,200
- Likes
- 2,650
Aha, did not know! Thank you.
You can't compare CSD waterfalls from multiple sources. I can make my waterfalls look perfect or terrible with just changing one parameter. A sign that a CSD waterfall is poorly done is above: everywhere there is a peak, there is going to be resonance. Yet your black and white waterfalls don't show any of it.
You can use that with any speaker. With actives like Neuman you only need Chromecast, a streamer and volume control (it can be a part of the streamer). Wiim mini (or new pro) come to mind.Maybe a dumb question.
could i use an ipad, prescription to qobuz, and this speaker to play music?
I know that. That’s why I posted all waterfalls from the same sourceYou can't compare CSD waterfalls from multiple sources. I can make my waterfalls look perfect or terrible with just changing one parameter. A sign that a CSD waterfall is poorly done is above: everywhere there is a peak, there is going to be resonance. Yet your black and white waterfalls don't show any of it.
Yes you can. I have this setup since last week in my living room and I'm very happy so far.Maybe a dumb question.
could i use an ipad, prescription to qobuz, and this speaker to play music?
hehe I recognize this.You know, I thought buying a sub would make my interest in new monitors disappear. Turns, out adding the sub made even more curious how much of an improvement KH 150's or 310's would make
Ya, you will notice a difference 100%. I’m sure the 150’s have better bass than my 120’s did without a sub but, regardless, they will never be able to get as low as a sub can. Integrated well into the system and you’ll get a true full range presentation. Makes a big differencehehe I recognize this.
I got the KH 150s last week. Very happy, but the KH 750 being available makes me very curious about the total effect as well.
Even though bass is plenty for my taste, I do remember the low frequencies from my old B&W 801 speakers and I'm curious what the addition of the KH 750 would do.
Though on the verge of getting OT, could you describe the difference how you perceive it? Background is I am running speakers with very similar bass response (almost same f3 and 6th order assisted tuning as well). I make ample use of room correction, otherwise they sound too muddy to my taste due to too excessive bass 50-100 Hz, but with RC enabled, very fast and punchy (this horse here drinks from another well). I would like to develope an idea of what I am missing out on without a sub to augment sub bass response down to Red Book low end.Makes a big difference
Bossman, I'm pretty sure this isn't accurate.everywhere there is a peak, there is going to be resonance
Keep in mind this is going to be coming from somebody who is an audiophile vs. a sound engineer. I just happen to like high quality, non voodoo audio so studio monitors are my jam for sure.Though on the verge of getting OT, could you describe the difference how you perceive it? Background is I am running speakers with very similar bass response (almost same f3 and 6th order assisted tuning as well). I make ample use of room correction, otherwise they sound too muddy to my taste due to too excessive bass 50-100 Hz, but with RC enabled, very fast and punchy (this horse here drinks from another well). I would like to develope an idea of what I am missing out on without a sub to augment sub bass response down to Red Book low end.
Is there an English translation of this?Another review with teardown.
Yes, here is the english version of the full review from Sound & Recording:Is there an English translation of this?
I am brand new here on this forus. Seems like a great place. Science instead of snake oil.I don't think they are very suitable for far-field listening. These are small bookshelf speakers. If you have a small room, sure. But otherwise, I don't think so.
Thank you very muchYes, here is the english version of the full review from Sound & Recording:
They work great at about 12’ (3.6m) away for hi-fi ( they say on their site that home listening is one of the areas in which the KH 150 work, it’s the sofa logo ). Of course it depends on what far field means in that context. Their site says up to a max of 18’, but that may be stretching it a bit. They perform and sound better than several of the passive speakers I have owned, many that were more per pair than the KH 150. Even when listening to mixes back in the day, I would often listen to “near field” monitors at a distance of 10’ or more, and in some studios the monitors were at that distance just because how they were positioned near the giant consoles.I am brand new here on this forus. Seems like a great place. Science instead of snake oil.
This is a very good point. These speakers are monitors. They are intended for nearfield studio work. The are not in any way intended for use as hi fidelity speakers for a midfield listening system.
I own TES Productions - a music production company. In my studio I presently have a pair of KH120's with a 750 sub and a pair of Neuman 310's. I am going to purchase a pair of KH150 the first week of January.
I will be using them as part of a second recording/tracking system with a new generation Audient 4816SE console (the first one sold by Audient). The 150's will be 1.5 meters from my head.
After I have a change to use them for a while I will post my comments here - including a compartion with the 120's/750 and the 310's. View attachment 252344View attachment 252345View attachment 252346View attachment 252346
O think it is important to remembr the engineerting resources that Neumann has poured into the design of these speakers. No one is going to match them but something they build in their garage. There is so much more involved than would appear. Watch the series of intro videos by Neumann on these. It is clear that Neumann did a tremendous amount of intense acoutic engineering here.This KH150 is ruler flat, thanks to dsp.
If I would screw a purifi 6,5 inch midwoofer in a stiff cabinet, with a bliesma midrange and tweeter, and use dsp (from a hypex plate amp FA253) to set crossovers and levels, measure and flatten the response, would it be possible to get the same ruler flat output?
Or do these companies have more intricate dsp to optimize the frequency response?
The reason why I ask this is that the man behind grimm once said that you could only achieve real high end results with meticulous adjusting a dsp within controlled circumstances and that this would be a different category than the dsp measurements at home, with umik/rew for example. Agree?
While they may be usable to some degree in a mid-farfield setting, please remember that these are studio monitors designed optimally for nearfield use. You can use your Ferrari SF90 to go down the block to buy groceries, but it isn't going to excell at that mission.Hofmann's Iron Law
three parameters that cannot all be had at the same time. They are low-bass reproduction, small (enclosure) size, and high (output) sensitivity." Hofmann stated that designers could pick two of these three parameters, but in doing so, it would compromise the third parameter.
DSP can get around ONE of those limitations, but at the expense of another.
Neumann has carefully limited the excursion of the woofer to prevent distortion. If they had chose to, they could have made them louder at the expense of increased distortion. They made the correct choice, for my purposes at least.The KH80 is tuned much higher and so can deliver more spl. The KH150 is tuned very low for such a small woofer, and so it goes less loud. That is Hofmann's Iron Law in speaker design. It's the woofer that limits that in this case. Even if the woofer in the 150 is a 6" woofer and in the KH80 a 4", this is still into play. And 88dB is already very loud in a nearfield situation, so that should be no issue. For far field listening, these are not fit, like said before,. Then you better get the bigger models.