What are your sources? Maybe you have the possibility to use an equalizer function. Or simply play back via Bluetooth from your smartphone and use an EQ app (on a trial basis).people have individual preferences
Spotify streaming from fire TV. Using Bluetooth didn't change things muchWhat are your sources? Maybe you have the possibility to use an equalizer function. Or simply play back via Bluetooth from your smartphone and use an EQ app (on a trial basis).
Amplifiers have no effect on soundstage. Lots of nonsense lately in this thread.After some more critical listening today I noticed that the Soundstage of nad is narrower. For sure there is no comparison in detail. Back to back I could hear sounds in nad stand out that I had to go back in dennon and pay attention to pick out. Comparing those two I feel like the nad doesn't justify the price premium to dennon. Rotel ra 1592 is coming....
Are you comparing blindly (ABX)? Are you level matching before listening? Are all sound effects (Loundness, Dyn EQ, Audyssey, etc) set to off in each device?After some more critical listening today I noticed that the Soundstage of nad is narrower. For sure there is no comparison in detail. Back to back I could hear sounds in nad stand out that I had to go back in dennon and pay attention to pick out. Comparing those two I feel like the nad doesn't justify the price premium to dennon. Rotel ra 1592 is coming....
What if we take a ~100W/ch Yamaha Top Art amp and compare that to a linear power output 75 Watt/ch pure class A? The class A part can take the backseat because it doesn't matter what matters is the 75 Watt@8R/150W@4R/300W@2R linear load-line power output rating that matters. Would that not affect the imaging versus a non-linear power output Yamaha? Like is the power output enough to make a difference in SPL and is there enough dynamic power output to peak at high enough levels to make that timing difference substantial enough for results? Does the additional linearity of power output make that last few percent of difference or is it infinitesimally small?Amplifiers have no effect on soundstage.
I think the OP compares the NAD C399 to a Denon X3800. Would you expect differences in imaging assuming all being set to neutral and level matched?What if we take a ~100W/ch Yamaha Top Art amp and compare that to a linear power output 75 Watt/ch pure class A? The class A part can take the backseat because it doesn't matter what matters is the 75 Watt@8R/150W@4R/300W@2R linear load-line power output rating that matters. Would that not affect the imaging versus a non-linear power output Yamaha? Like is the power output enough to make a difference in SPL and is there enough dynamic power output to peak at high enough levels to make that timing difference substantial enough for results? Does the additional linearity of power output make that last few percent of difference or is it infinitesimally small?
I think they are significantly different enough on the power specs that there could at least be a imaging variation. That's why I think a linear power output amp has a benefit compared to something less capable. I really am flying by the seat of my pants on this and not being objective enough to really say. Doing the physics on it all from signal end to transducer and to the ear to the brain would be pretty cool to determine the imaging requirements and then prove or disprove the SPL at the ear for the imaging peaks. Lotsa variation on skills and science there.I think the OP compares the NAD C399 to a Denon X3800. Would you expect differences in imaging assuming all being set to neutral and level matched?
Thanks. Interesting. My seats of pants tended towards that the difference would be very very hard to detect audibly when playing music at reasonable levels. But as you said one would have to run the numbers.I think they are significantly different enough on the power specs that there could at least be a imaging variation. That's why I think a linear power output amp has a benefit compared to something less capable. I really am flying by the seat of my pants on this and not being objective enough to really say. Doing the physics on it all from signal end to transducer and to the ear to the brain would be pretty cool to determine the imaging requirements and then prove or disprove the SPL at the ear for the imaging peaks. Lotsa variation on skills and science there.
As an owner of this product, I think the BluOS module is essential to its value. Many seem to have success with miniDSP products in combination with a more basic amplifier; probably a cheaper route but was not worth the hassle to me ensuring the piecemeal solution had all the required inputs in combination with a quality amp when this had it all in a single box.Ok. Tried to make the test as objective as I could. There is definitely a difference in sound of denon pma 600ne. (Btw). I also tested the rotel....
Unfortunately I don't think I will keep the nad. Discovered what seems to be a bug. Remember when I mentioned increasing bass didn't make any difference? This is cause it doesn't work. I figured a way to make it work. If I first change tremble and then try again, it works.
Can this behavior be confirmed by another user?Remember when I mentioned increasing bass didn't make any difference? This is cause it doesn't work. I figured a way to make it work. If I first change tremble and then try again, it works.
Are you using digital input on both Denon and NAD? If so, you are not just comparing amplifiers, but DACs as well. Nevertheless, if you have already decided on returning the unit then no actions are adviced, but a comparison with external DAC would be interesting.Ok. Tried to make the test as objective as I could. There is definitely a difference in sound of denon pma 600ne. (Btw). I also tested the rotel....
This is exactly what would be expectedI also remember that NAD C 399 sounded bit more lean and neutral compared to NAD M10
Can this behavior be confirmed by another user?
If not, you should do a factory reset.
I assume that you have the latest firmware on your C399.
Yes, I can confirm this. I think I found the problem. When tone controls are enabled and treble is set to 0, the tone control setting is ignored when switching on the amp although it appears "on" in the settings. Switching it off an on again will enable them.Unfortunately I don't think I will keep the nad. Discovered what seems to be a bug. Remember when I mentioned increasing bass didn't make any difference? This is cause it doesn't work. I figured a way to make it work. If I first change tremble and then try again, it works.