Pearljam5000
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 5,292
- Likes
- 5,546
- Thread Starter
- #1,941
30th anniversary Nautilus
I am truly “baffled” by the big Wilson and Focal designs that use mechanical driver adjustments to achieve “coherent” wave arrival. An active design using a dsp and three or four good amps would get there more effectively I think.
I think you misunderstand my post.disagree. With nearly everything else, beauty and styling matters as much as its performance at its intended function.
OMG, I'd shoot the person who tried to put them in my house. LOL30th anniversary Nautilus
Look like a B&W person got high, saw a snail and thought hmmm.
Yes, if you sit a bit higher or lower all the mm precise time alignment is wrong againI met a Wilson rep at a Wilson audio demonstration a couple of weeks ago. He said it was all about time alignment, something I am skeptical about. The range of adjustment is only up to a few cm between minimum and maximum. This would equate to a time difference of a fraction of a millisecond (10cm = 0.291ms). I suspect it's more a combination of adjusting the vertical dispersion and marketing.
I also asked how they "time align" the speaker when they come to your house to install the Wilson's. Do they use a microphone? Actually no, they use a table where they look up various distances and adjust the tilt of the modules accordingly.
It's just a special colorLook like a B&W person got high, saw a snail and thought hmmm.
I don't know if the "30th anniversary" is any better then the older models because there is no specs but the older ones do:
View attachment 294749
Specs are pretty meh
It's the most beautiful speakers ever madeI think you misunderstand my post.
My main point or question is does excellent performance come with the
expensive cosmetic styling? It seems many times our measurements have shown
them not to go hand in hand.
The other one is strickly personal, I'll pay for performance first. If they don't look so
hot I can live with that
OMG, I'd shoot the person who tried to put them in my house. LOL
I think you misunderstand my post.
My main point or question is does excellent performance come with the
expensive cosmetic styling? It seems many times our measurements have shown
them not to go hand in hand.
The other one is strickly personal, I'll pay for performance first. If they don't look so
hot I can live with that
But it's not aluminum, thus it can't be any good ?? ...It's the most beautiful speakers ever made
It's even better than aluminumBut it's not aluminum, thus it can't be any good ?? ...
On that, recently saw in Amir's 2023 Pacific Audio Fest Report a Focal Speaker called "Sopra Concrete Brown", perhaps made of concrete ... Immediately thought of @Pearljam5000 and came up with these conclusions:
1) It couldn't be good since it wasn't a Genelec.
2) ... and it was made of concrete, the horror!
3) Why not Aluminum reinforced concrete or concrete reinforced aluminum?.... Perhaps it would have a chance..
Peace.
An early prototype:
Yes, there's no substitute for digital time delay.I am truly “baffled” by the big Wilson and Focal designs that use mechanical driver adjustments to achieve “coherent” wave arrival. An active design using a dsp and three or four good amps would get there more effectively I think.
And coincidental drivers as otherwise you can only have time alignment for one axis but for example the reflected off-axis sound won't be.Yes, there's no substitute for digital time delay.
A hard enough 'accidental' shove and you could simply impale them.OMG, I'd shoot the person who tried to put them in my house.
Maybe it's an acquired taste?OMG, I'd shoot the person who tried to put them in my house. LOL
But that still leaves open the question of whether you can hear any improvements from digital time delay. I remember flying up to Jim Salk's house in Michigan to hear one of my designs with the stock passive crossover compared with a digitally optimized active version that included a phase coherent response and correction for room modes in the bass. We could switch back and forth instantly and neither Jim nor I could hear any difference except in the bass, where the room correction did tame a room mode noticeably. That's not definitive evidence by any means. But I'm not aware of any carefully controlled tests with loudspeakers (rather than headphones on test signals) that have shown any audible improvement. I remain agnostic on the issue, but we shouldn't simply assume there a benefit.Yes, there's no substitute for digital time delay.