To a pisher, it might seem that way. For the rest of the people, there is plenty of proper information here.
My temporary teacher in elementary school said, "every classroom needs a clown; don't you try to be the one!" So think hard before you throw out an insult with zero content.
Amir's review shows these particular speakers have a remarkably even and wide dispersion of, perhaps, 70-80 degrees to each side. Most floorstanding speakers have, at best, 50 degrees horizontal dispersion. So the direct answer to your question is: "Yes, these are designed specifically to be pointed straight ahead and provide a wide range of seating positions with good sound. Standard speakers generally cannot do that."Great to see in-wall speakers being reviewed. I am doing a home theater build with 3 in wall speakers (LCR) behind an acoustically transparent screen. Having always been a floor standing speaker guy, would it make sense to get in wall speakers that can be aimed? Toe-in is always a big deal on floor standing speakers. Or do these type of speakers work well mounted in wall and pointed straight ahead?
Amire
Why do you use this language? ( "To a pisher..." )
It show your ability to accept criticism. Not much.
You might think, when you shave in the morning, and look in the mirror, that you are perfect. Well no one is.
The more you report, the more flaw emerge from the data. I just try to point you with that FB, maybe it will help you to fix them.
The cheerleaders might make you happy, but there is nothing for you to improve.
You can use it or not, it's up to you, but you can not use this kind of language against your readers.
Last time, on another thread here, where you couldn't cope with my say, you blocked me, and then you suggested for me to try a different hobby.
A big say for a guy like you. I'll return you with the same say: I suggested you to try a different profession.
Don't publish reports (criticism on audio equipment) if you can't take some yourself.
Your language against me, is a shame.
Dude/dudette,Amire
Why do you use this language? ( "To a pisher..." )
It show your ability to accept criticism. Not much.
You might think, when you shave in the morning, and look in the mirror, that you are perfect. Well no one is.
The more you report, the more flaw emerge from the data. I just try to point you with that FB, maybe it will help you to fix them.
The cheerleaders might make you happy, but there is nothing for you to improve.
You can use it or not, it's up to you, but you can not use this kind of language against your readers.
Last time, on another thread here, where you couldn't cope with my say, you blocked me, and then you suggested for me to try a different hobby.
A big say for a guy like you. I'll return you with the same say: I suggested you to try a different profession.
Don't publish reports (criticism on audio equipment) if you can't take some yourself.
Your language against me, is a shame.
Thanks. Let's do it as we have Revel spin data for their in-walls including the W990. Please start a conversation with me and we will take it from there.I just purchased 4x Revel W990's and would be happy to ship one over. They're Revel's top of the line in-wall with a 9" woofer.
https://www.revelspeakers.com/produ...W990-_color=Black-GLOBAL-Current&cgid=in-wall
Only the first one. Partially.Is the exceptional horizontal radiation pattern seen here (+/-80 degrees) the results of:
- Deliberate and excellent engineering from Monoprice?
- A general property of in-wall speakers?
- A measurement fixture artifact?
- Or something else?
Agreed. Not in the business of creating fixtures for holding speakers. You ideally want a speaker provider to provide the test fixture for the speaker that they used for their own testing and development. Especially since they must have created something to test the speaker with. And if they didn't create one, then I think you know the results of the test already.Ah, let me know if you have the link. I don't think these speakers are standardized though.
I do have a CNC machine so once I have my workshop back together, I can easily cut out custom inserts. This one was done with portable tools and was crude and dirty.
Then again, messing with fixture takes time away from testing other products.
This creates a lot of complexity for testing. If we are talking air tight, then that will make it impossible to use the same box to test multiple speakers as I won't be able to just swap out the baffle. Speakers themselves also don't come with air tight seal. They just have pressure fit fasteners.I agree that sealing the box makes sense for the above reasons and also for consistency.
I have looked at this a number of times. As I noted, the hardware+software for this option costs 13,000 euros. It is also not clear to me how we can measure full speakers with it as opposed to drivers. It is made for a max (circular) driver size, not tall in-walls like I just measured.I believe to properly measure in-wall speakers, the Klippel NFS baffle measurement option is required.
If you ask me, I don't think so. I just believe, without using the option, the standard NFS measurement and analysis aren't very applicable to in-wall speaker.I have looked at this a number of times. As I noted, the hardware+software for this option costs 13,000 euros. It is also not clear to me how we can measure full speakers with it as opposed to drivers. It is made for a max (circular) driver size, not tall in-walls like I just measured.
Do we want to make this level of investment here?