Making further progress, TOPPING’s new flagship amplifier will be launched in late May!

[192kbps]

B100
32 ohms, more than ten watts.
Except for power, other parameters of this model are better than LA90D.
The price of two units is lower than the price of one LA90D

 

[192kbps]

B200
4 ohm 200W
It can be thought of as an LA90D without a volume knob, but with a bridge output.
B stands for bridge output
B100 is T'ang-ku-la Module, and B200 is NFCA Module.

 

[bboris77]

AKA "The Brick"

 

[tom_tom]

are those monoblocks ?

 

[ppataki]

The unit in the second picture is definitely a mono amp

 

[renoxd]

Topping, you could try to make Integrated 2ch amp with DAC (or Powered DAC, like Sabaj A30, or SMSL VMV A2), with sub out, volumne controll etc. Would be nice to see something like that from Topping

 

[Vladetz]

Topping, you could try to make Integrated 2ch amp with DAC (or Powered DAC, like Sabaj A30, or SMSL VMV A2), with sub out, volumne controll etc. Would be nice to see something like that from Topping

Topping mx3s

 

[Vladetz]

So B100 is close to A70 Pro (T'ang-ku-la Module) which also gives 10 watts at 32 ohms. Topping headphone and speaker amps are converging

 

[renoxd]

Topping mx3s

but more powerful

 

[Sokel]

So B100 is close to A70 Pro (T'ang-ku-la Module) which also gives 10 watts at 32 ohms. Topping headphone and speaker amps are converging

I think it's 100 watt that gives,not 10.

 

[Vladetz]

I think it's 100 watt that gives,not 10.

As @192kbps said. Of course it has 100 watts but at 4 ohms

 

[Sokel]

As @192kbps said. Of course it has 100 watts but at 4 ohms
View attachment 362945

Oh,I mind skipped that,you're right.
But why 32Ohm,that's a strange spec for speakers,is that an HP amp?

 

[xema]

Oh,I mind skipped that,you're right.
But why 32Ohm,that's a strange spec for speakers,is that an HP amp?

if 100w@4ohm
then theoretically 50w@8ohm
25w@16
12.5w@32

well if not so perfect, it will be larger than it, so 12.5@32 is a minimum value

 

[Vladetz]

Oh,I mind skipped that,you're right.
But why 32Ohm,that's a strange spec for speakers,is that an HP amp?

It is really interesting to have 32 ohm spec for speaker amp. Maybe headphone out on the back panel? Or just an ability to work with very variable impedance speaker. Also power figure points to similarity with A70 Pro amplifier module

 

[Sokel]

It is really interesting to have 32 ohm spec for speaker amp. Maybe headphone out on the back panel? Or just an ability to work with very variable impedance speaker. Also power figure points to similarity with A70 Pro amplifier module

I get it the other way,I want to know speaker's variable impedance and phase if I was ever about (never,EVER though) to use a load dependent amp to drive it so I can run my calculations with VirtuixCad,etc.
But now that you say it it's an interesting thought to see what an amp does up there.

(some include open load measurements in their data sheets and that's nice)

 

[Guddu]

are those monoblocks ?

Seems like it in the picture.

 

[Tangram]

The unit in the second picture is definitely a mono amp

They are both mono, they just show the different finish available !

 

[howard416]

I don't care. They can stop building amps for all the good it's going to do me.

 

[DLS79]

I don't care. They can stop building amps for all the good it's going to do me.

Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning?

 

[Guddu]

I don't care. They can stop building amps for all the good it's going to do me.

Probably many won't as well, for sure!
They have done worst with PA5 already, and then rectified errors with PA5 II & PA 7 soon after.
They are clearly making progress to power amplifiers, might come up with something really good though.