Jakob1863
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Honestly Jakob I just don't have the energy to read through your pages of nebulous waffling to try and figure out,what point you are actually making...If any at all.
Which is surprising, as i give you a precise and (concise i´d say ) answer:
"it is as easy to get incorrect results under "blind" conditions as it is in sighted listening tests"
and that line was to "nebulous" for your liking? Wow!
And you especially asked for evidence and yours truly cited 5 references, in which the data was given that confirmed my assertion, even with short summaries so you wouldn´t have to do the hard reading work.
And still you couldn´t figure it out?
The only thing I have been able to draw so far is that you are trying to discredit blind testing by using the rationale that "anything is possible" without any evidence that something specific is happening.
I´m at a loss why you were so deeply misinterpreting, i mean there is an ongoing discussion in this thread where amirm tries to discredit a controlled "blind" listening test we did, but let´s try again in a thought experiment:
If i would write about the various dangers of driving cars, would that be "trying to discredit car driving" or would it be more to encourage to be careful when driving car and to take appropriate measures to make it more safe?
Jakob, please answer Amirs question concisely.
said the guy, who answered my questions (wrt details of your golden ear went deaf experiences) with concise .......silence??