I'm not sure you're going to have any luck with these kinds of posts on this forum.
To me it gets tiring to see people making these kinds of claims. How are you supposed to respond to that? Seriously, if someone says "Oh I changed my cable to this other one and it opened up the sound stage and improved the bass so much!", responding to them is the exact same as responding to someone who says, "Guys, I bought these rocks and put it in my trunk and they improved my MPG by 2x!! This hobby of finding MPG rocks is the best!". You can't have a conversation with someone who is fully immersed in a personal delusion.
The purpose of this forum(and, imo, any good internet audio forum) is to try and figure out what genuinely improves audio, in a repeatable manner, and what doesn't. If you treat it like a hobby where anything goes and it's all just whatever seems subjectively best to you, that's fine. But what's the point of discussing that on a forum? Your subjective impressions and mine have no common ground without the science. It doesn't mean anything. It's like two philosophers having a conversation without having agreed upon their assumptions at the start. Without an accepted context, there cannot be a productive conversation. The scientific research is this forum's accepted context.
That doesn't mean anyone is accepting the science without question, heck, we have many threads 10s of pages long where people question and discuss the science, where it has holes and how to actually apply it to speaker building and room correction and all sorts of other endeavours to improve their audio experience in their home. That is people enjoying the hobby. You can ignore the delusional parts of the audiophile hobby and still have fun with the parts that are actually supported by research. It's still just as fun, I assure you. Possibly even more fun