Electric_Haggis
Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2021
- Messages
- 45
- Likes
- 29
I'll take that as a positive reply...Best if you remain convinced of that and don't try the comparison![]()
I'll take that as a positive reply...Best if you remain convinced of that and don't try the comparison![]()
The snake oil you tuber don't care about the sales of any opamp they don't own those companies.
15 years on this web page talking about opamp is snake oil. And thousand of user talking about opamps is snake oil.
![]()
The Opamp thread
Dip8 is footprint of most trough hole opamps. Soic8 is the smd equivalent. Seeing pictures in reviews of your amp, it is dip8, and they supply 5532 opamp in dip8. If you can open it and send picture directly here, i can tell for certain.www.head-fi.org
I think you have to proof first that you don't have any earing impairment.Provide actual evidence - measurements or proper blind test - otherwise all you are bringing are claims. That which can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
We know you do. That is why we know we don't need to believe you in the absence of more convincing science and/or engineering based evidence. Your hearing - just like every other human being's - is easily fooled by cognitive biases. You literally can't believe what you hear.I believe what I ear and never listen/ear through the graphics.
You an t&t i beleive are lurking on the wrong audio forum.Dear @T&T you have to respect yourself a little more!!! The crew of haters on this site are destroying any audiophile discussion. So I am discussing what I hear, not what is measured in some device. These measurements are only an aid, because in the final the hearing test always decides. Ask the constructors, the measurements are only halfway to the final.
It is not worth arguing with electricians whose level of electricity is spread around the house. I have a V3 and have PLAYED a lot with the power supply and the OPA, got great results, and would love to share my experience but @antcollinet destroys any healthy discussion. I don't know why he is wasting his time on this site, there are all kinds of people in this world.
This is indeed the user impression thread. I just would make sure that comparisons are blind with level matching and so forth.Dear @T&T you have to respect yourself a little more!!! The crew of haters on this site are destroying any audiophile discussion. So I am discussing what I hear, not what is measured in some device. These measurements are only an aid, because in the final the hearing test always decides. Ask the constructors, the measurements are only halfway to the final.
It is not worth arguing with electricians whose level of electricity is spread around the house. I have a V3 and have PLAYED a lot with the power supply and the OPA, got great results, and would love to share my experience but @antcollinet destroys any healthy discussion. I don't know why he is wasting his time on this site, there are all kinds of people in this world.
We are most definitely not exactly the crowd this place exists for, but I enjoy seeing how they look at things here because at the end of the day, people like us need a starting point to work from. If the ASR community identifies a component with excellent base performance, then people like us can rest in confidence that when people such as we DO play around with things that ASR members consider no-nos like op-amp rolling, we’re starting with a quality component on the first place. Lipstick on a supermodel as opposed to lipstick on a pig, so to speak.You an t&t i beleive are lurking on the wrong audio forum.
Lurking???You an t&t i beleive are lurking on the wrong audio forum.
Quality,measurement wise - yes (at some metrics) .We are most definitely not exactly the crowd this place exists for, but I enjoy seeing how they look at things here because at the end of the day, people like us need a starting point to work from. If the ASR community identifies a component with excellent base performance, then people like us can rest in confidence that when people such as we DO play around with things that ASR members consider no-nos like op-amp rolling, we’re starting with a quality component on the first place. Lipstick on a supermodel as opposed to lipstick on a pig, so to speak.
-Ed
Yes. We play (WE PLAY!!!), and they are a kind of sect with very strict rules, all axiomsWe are most definitely not exactly the crowd this place exists for, but I enjoy seeing how they look at things here because at the end of the day, people like us need a starting point to work from. If the ASR community identifies a component with excellent base performance, then people like us can rest in confidence that when people such as we DO play around with things that ASR members consider no-nos like op-amp rolling, we’re starting with a quality component on the first place. Lipstick on a supermodel as opposed to lipstick on a pig, so to speak.
-Ed
What do you think they feel like when they (accidentally) visit and read stuff on sites like AudioKarma or Audiogon forums with people waxing praise over $3,000 power cables?Yes. We play (WE PLAY!!!), and they are a kind of sect with very strict rules, all axioms
I can respect that, well said. There is definitely great knowledge to be gleaned here. I in the past have done some op amp rolling. Came to the same conclusion as most members here. The jist of this hobby is to enjoy music and our gear. Enjoy your equipment and have fun with it.We are most definitely not exactly the crowd this place exists for, but I enjoy seeing how they look at things here because at the end of the day, people like us need a starting point to work from. If the ASR community identifies a component with excellent base performance, then people like us can rest in confidence that when people such as we DO play around with things that ASR members consider no-nos like op-amp rolling, we’re starting with a quality component on the first place. Lipstick on a supermodel as opposed to lipstick on a pig, so to speak.
-Ed
Because this is "Audio Science Review", not "Audio I want to Believe Review". We promote science and engineering grounded discussion here, rather than. uncontrolled, and scientifically invalid sighted listening comparisons. Sure - we can talk about what we hear when the measurements, and/or engineering tell us there is something to be heard - but it really doesn't make much sense when the science and engineering tells us there isn't.I don't know why he is wasting his time on this site, there are all kinds of people in this world.
Could you be more specific about who you are?We promote science and engineering grounded discussion here
Is it not science - the process involved, instrumentation used and attributes used for the measurements and describing those measurements?What does science have to do with technical measurements of a device?
Hope you don't mind me asking for some explainination, genuinely willing to learn.Science is something completely different and engineering is something exact.
That's actually an interesting question. I went looking for a "mission statement" or equivalent for the site, and didn't find anything. So I asked copilot (AI) and got this:Could you be more specific about who you are?
The Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum aims to bring together enthusiasts who enjoy discussing audio and related topics. It’s a place where members share knowledge, engage in scientific discussions, and explore audio hardware reviews. If you’re curious about audio science, this forum is a great resource!
Measurements are more towards the engineering side. Though there are plenty of science based discussion - eg see the psychoacoustics sub forum.What does science have to do with technical measurements of a device?
Are there any scientific breakthroughs here?
Science is something completely different and engineering is something exact.
Because non scientific reviews suck, are meaningless, and only help people looking to impress by product name:What does science have to do with technical measurements of a device?