• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Elac Debut Reference DBR-62 Speaker Review

Newman

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
3,448
Likes
4,209
Thanks for pointing that out. Bipole is far more palatable.

15 years ago Toole made an analysis and concluded that bipolar surround speakers were an idea that made sense for early, matrixed-stereo surround mixing, but not appropriate for the modern era of discrete multi-channel sound. He says to use normal speakers instead. [Correction: I was thinking of dipole surround models, and Toole’s analysis was about dipole surround speakers.]

I have been assuming that their continued presence in the sales listings has been a triumph of marketing over engineering, where they can be marketed as ‘specialised’ surround speakers.

cheers
 
Last edited:

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,736
Likes
16,158
15 years ago Toole made an analysis and concluded that bipolar surround speakers were an idea that made sense for early, matrixed-stereo surround mixing, but not appropriate for the modern era of discrete multi-channel sound. He says to use normal speakers instead.
He was saying that mainly about the back then still popular surround dipoles, see the chapter 18.4.3 Multidirectional Surround Loudspeakers in his previous edition of the book.
 

Chromatischism

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
4,765
Likes
3,703
15 years ago Toole made an analysis and concluded that bipolar surround speakers were an idea that made sense for early, matrixed-stereo surround mixing, but not appropriate for the modern era of discrete multi-channel sound. He says to use normal speakers instead.

I have been assuming that their continued presence in the sales listings has been a triumph of marketing over engineering, where they can be marketed as ‘specialised’ surround speakers.
They are still recommended for small rooms where seats will be close to the speakers.
 

Newman

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
3,448
Likes
4,209
@thewas quite right, I was thinking of dipole. I have corrected my post.

cheers
 
Last edited:

Beershaun

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
1,864
Likes
1,910
Excited to see the floorstanding 3-way and the center channel now up for sale. I have been really enjoying my standmount/bookshelf speakers alongside my SVS SB-2000!
 

Vyacheslav

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
11
Likes
1
Location
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Today in St. Petersburg (Russia) I visited a store to listen to acoustics.
The seller offered to listen to: ELAC Debut Reference DBR62, DALI Oberon 3 and Monitor Audio Bronze 100 6G.
I didn't spend a lot of time choosing tracks for comparing acoustics, and the list of the following compositions seemed to me more than enough:
Arnett Cobb - Blue Me.
From the album Touch Yello - Till Tomorrow and Friday Smile.
Compilation by Robbie Williams - Sin Sin Sin, Advertising Space, Angels, Lazy Days.
Eagles - Hotel California.
Each person hears individually, so I will describe what I heard.
DALI Oberon 3 vs ELAC Debut Reference DBR62
Oberon 3 Well built stage, everything in its place. When switching the amplifier to Debut Reference DBR62, the effect of a concave lens was obtained, as if the vocals were pushed far back, the feeling that the sound picture was not complete.
DALI Oberon 3 vs Monitor Audio Bronze 100 6G comparison
The sound of the Bronze 100 6G is flat and somewhat rough.
 

nathan

Senior Member
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
361
Likes
252
Thanks for sharing. Dali is a good choice.

Off axis I would guess the Dali would easily win this comparison due to their extra treble which is a totally fair approach.
 

Chromatischism

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
4,765
Likes
3,703
I'd be curious to see measurements on the Dali's. It sounds like they have a mid-range bump, above neutral. I'd also wonder if that would harm longer term listening.

All just speculation of course. Personally I wouldn't want more midrange from my DFR, I think they have the right balance.
 

ksulliva01

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
18
Likes
12
the effect of a concave lens was obtained, as if the vocals were pushed far back,

Interesting way of putting this - but I know exactly what you mean and I've noticed this same "lensing"effect. Different recordings exhibit it more prominently. On certain recordings I think it may actually be a subjective enhancement, adding a bit of the "refinement" that these speakers are often quoted as exhibiting, but when raw, upfront energy is needed by a vocalist or heavier guitar/synth etc. sometimes these sounds can seem recessed in the soundstage in a way that feels like something a little more than just freq response. I think this effect has contributed to the oft-repeated "boring" description of the dbr62. I listened to some metal the other day, which I rarely do, and was like huh... yeah I guess I get the "boring" thing now. This effect can create a beautiful smoothness to the mid range, but at the expense of sapping a little rawness/energy.
 

realdb

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
39
Likes
19
^ I am using and recommend: https://www.audiophonics.fr/en/powe...reo-amplifier-ncore-2x250w-4-ohm-p-14278.html

Pair it with a good DAC/Preamp and it doesn't get audibly better.

Sorry I am a noob, and I would love to know which preamp, dac and streamer would you recommend.

System
Speaker: Elac DBR62
Amp: AUDIOPHONICS MPA-S250NC
Preamp: Need recommendations
DAC: Need recommendations
Streamer: Need recommendations(Would love if it is something that had HDMI & Airplay too, apart from the standard Spotify connect etc)
 

weasels

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
335
Likes
546
Location
Richmond, Virginia
Sorry I am a noob, and I would love to know which preamp, dac and streamer would you recommend.

System
Speaker: Elac DBR62
Amp: AUDIOPHONICS MPA-S250NC
Preamp: Need recommendations
DAC: Need recommendations
Streamer: Need recommendations(Would love if it is something that had HDMI & Airplay too, apart from the standard Spotify connect etc)


I'd go with something like a Topping D50s, which has a volume control and BT, so can cover both the preamp and DAC functions (unless you need a phono preamp).
 

T.T.

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
28
Likes
22
Location
Slovakia
Interesting way of putting this - but I know exactly what you mean and I've noticed this same "lensing"effect. Different recordings exhibit it more prominently. On certain recordings I think it may actually be a subjective enhancement, adding a bit of the "refinement" that these speakers are often quoted as exhibiting, but when raw, upfront energy is needed by a vocalist or heavier guitar/synth etc. sometimes these sounds can seem recessed in the soundstage in a way that feels like something a little more than just freq response. I think this effect has contributed to the oft-repeated "boring" description of the dbr62. I listened to some metal the other day, which I rarely do, and was like huh... yeah I guess I get the "boring" thing now. This effect can create a beautiful smoothness to the mid range, but at the expense of sapping a little rawness/energy.

@ksulliva01, @Vyacheslav, I had similar experience initially, but it did improve significantly when I eliminated reflections (and I have not yet treated the ceiling, which based on the measurements could be the main culprit). Also toe-in adjustment has noticable effect on the soundstage.

my original post:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...rence-dbr-62-speaker-review.12232/post-598375
 

nathan

Senior Member
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
361
Likes
252
Interesting point. Yes those Dali are about $900 in the US whereas the ELAC at about $600. (Both prices are per pair.) So it is a little bit unfair, in that sense. But not unreasonable completely in that someone might well decide $300 is a fine premium to pay if it makes an audible difference.

Since I am cross shopping with the Focal Aria 906....and building out eventually a 7.x.4 system from the same vendor -- while the Dali are then obviously in the range I personally am considering (the Focal are priced like the Dali) the price difference is non trivial, especially once multiplying it by several times to complete the full setup, so the more expensive options better be a step up!

That being said, while a speaker that places things more forward may be more exciting, it may also not be what the recording engineer intended, and may be tiresome after a while. Each person, however, has their own preferences and I have certainly selected and been happy with gear that editorializes a bit, from time to time. I love the Harman curve on my AKG headphones for example!
 

weasels

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
335
Likes
546
Location
Richmond, Virginia
The store in Russia where I listened to acoustic systems today

https://www.audiomania.ru/polochnaya_akustika/elac/elac_debut_reference_dbr-b6.html
ELAC Debut Reference DBR62
595,18 USD

https://www.audiomania.ru/polochnaya_akustika/dali/dali_oberon_3.html
DALI Oberon 3
654,48 USD

Yeah, that's a lot closer in price than in the US. For an extra $60 per pair I'd go with whatever you preferred while listening, particularly if the dealer allows for returns if you change your mind.
 

realdb

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
39
Likes
19
Is it just me or I see lack of bass in these speakers. Like total lack of or may be I am doing something wrong. Being a super noob and minimalist I have paired them with sonos amp. And gosh I love the clarity and sound stage just wow amazing. :)

However one place they fall apart is the bass/low end esp at low volume. I don't know if its just me, or a bad pair of speakers or something else in my setting. Sadly trying to figure out how to make them sound better in low end without getting a sub.
 
Top Bottom