No, Dc-coupling is a design option but you have to take care of unwanted DC by Design.Are capacitors in the signal path needed for balanced/symmetrical/differential input stages?
No, Dc-coupling is a design option but you have to take care of unwanted DC by Design.Are capacitors in the signal path needed for balanced/symmetrical/differential input stages?
Maybe this is one of the reasons for the exceptional performance of the Topping LA90No, Dc-coupling is a design option but you have to take care of unwanted DC by Design.
Electronic design needs to find the best compromises for a lot of aspects. So one detail is nothing because it can create problems in other areas.Maybe this is one of the reasons for the exceptional performance of the Topping LA90
That's true. But I assume that a capacitor in the signal path can be a limiting factor.Electronic design needs to find the best compromises for a lot of aspects. So one detail is nothing because it can create problems in other areas.
You always have capacitors in the signal path, not for coupling, but for band-wide limiting, filtering, and so on. In some circuits (tube amps, for example), a coupling capacitor is essential.That's true. But I assume that a capacitor in the signal path can be a limiting factor
I didn't make a general statement. Instead I used words like maybe, I assume, can be..You always have capacitors in the signal path, not for coupling, but for band-wide limiting, filtering, and so on. In some circuits (tube amps, for example), a coupling capacitor is essential.
You need to analyze the whole circuit. The hook on one part with a general statement makes no sense, as @DonH56 already said.
True. This is discussed in the TI app note and Self's book. The key is to have a DC bias on the cap and to keep the AC voltage < 80mV. The size of the cap depends on the impedances in the circuit so as to keep the AC voltage < 80mV at the lowest desired frequency. Also Self warns against using the el caps to set the corner frequency, because then the AC voltage will increase, and also because el caps have very poor tolerances. Just use them for DC decoupling.The impact of electrolytic capacitors in the signal path depends upon their biasing and the impedances on either side (which also determine the corner frequency). I don't think it is accurate to make a blanket statement that smaller than so-and-so produces too high distortion.
Not needed, but in general most audio signal paths use capacitors somewhere to block DC, because DC is never beneficial for audio.Are capacitors in the signal path needed for balanced/symmetrical/differential input stages?
It depends upon details of the circuit design. A DC-coupled design will not have capacitors, but many designs do include them (differential or not) to prevent amplifying DC (not usually desirable as it can quickly destroy speakers) and/or because the biasing of the input (or output) stage my not be centered around ground.Are capacitors in the signal path needed for balanced/symmetrical/differential input stages?
Self says in his book that DC bias is not needed. Does someone know any measurements which proof or disproof his claim?True. This is discussed in the TI app note and Self's book. The key is to have a DC bias on the cap and to keep the AC voltage < 80mV.
Yep.The size of the cap depends on the impedances in the circuit so as to keep the AC voltage < 80mV at the lowest desired frequency. Also Self warns against using the el caps to set the corner frequency, because then the AC voltage will increase, and also because el caps have very poor tolerances. Just use them for DC decoupling.
Self says in his book that DC bias is not needed. Does someone know any measurements which proof or disproof his claim?
How did you do a blind test when you are changing the hardware?No way. For 100% it is noticeable. In blind test 10 out of 10.
I had 2 the same DACs and modified one of them and made comparisons with broad community of experienced audiophiles. One of my (budged, $1200 List price) modified DAC sounded better than $25.000 DAC. But I will not share anything more about that case so do not even ask.How did you do a blind test when you are changing the hardware?
Are you sure one wast unstable (ringing)? Measurements would prove things.I had 2 the same DACs and modified one of them and made comparisons with broad community of experienced audiophiles. One of my (budged, $1200 List price) modified DAC sounded better than $25.000 DAC. But I will not share anything more about that case so do not even ask.
How do you know the difference didn't come from other differences (eg component tolerances) between the two dacs?I had 2 the same DACs and modified one of them and made comparisons with broad community of experienced audiophiles. One of my (budged, $1200 List price) modified DAC sounded better than $25.000 DAC. But I will not share anything more about that case so do not even ask.
Nonsens. 2 identical DAC with the same sound signature at the beginning. Tolerances, no, the problem IMO is "highly overrated", but in some cases I may be wrong.How do you know the difference didn't come from other differences (eg component tolerances) between the two dacs?
Measurements are nonsense? Whats nonsense is "DAC sound signature."Nonsens. 2 identical DAC with the same sound signature at the beginning. Tolerances, no, the problem IMO is "highly overrated", but in some cases I may be wrong.
Thanks, brand new results by Self himself. Good to know but one really has to measure the caps performances since he found caps where higher DC spec did not deliver lower distortion as expected. Hmmm.One more factor, the caps voltage rating. When used for DC blocking a 50v 100uf cap has lower distortion than a 25v 100uf.
Selecting Electrolytic Capacitors for Lowest Distortion
Douglas Self shares real experiments when selecting electrolytic capacitors to achieve the lowest distortion. An experiment inspired by his recent audioXpress article, "Optimizing Variable-Frequency Tone Controls," available online. This short piece is an interesting closer examination on the...audioxpress.com