- Thread Starter
- #21
I can get them for 380 EUR.
Is this design good, no separate tweeter?
It's a coaxial design. Supposed to be better because the tweeter is in the middle of the bass-midrange driver.I can get them for 380 EUR.
Is this design good, no separate tweeter?
Try to find Elac DBR62's for a good price which is probably best you can get for that money.
I have Q3030i's which are not bad with R-N402D but I ended up using it only as an power amplifier Q3030i's plugged and with two subwoofer's.
AB class Yamahas aren't very tolerant to low impedance loads so advice is to go with speakers that won't deep under 4 Ohms.
Hello
I have Yamaha R-S202D stereo receiver (FM, DAB+, BLUETOOTH).
View attachment 281321
I'm looking for pair of bookshelf speakers, which will be good match for this stereo receiver.
In which price range should I look? Around 300 EUR or less, more?
What speaker will you recommend? White color will be a plus point.
Maybe Triangle Borea BR03, for 400 EUR. Is this too good, too expensive speaker for this receiver?
View attachment 281325
Thank you
Kind regards
I do hope this is not general advice. My amp doesn't have "12 o'clock" position. My experience with Yamaha amps suggests that above 10 o'clock is fine, for what it's worth.Volume knob position at least 12 o’clock. Below than that means you’re not utilizing it.
Not only volume controls are digital (1-100 logarithmic scale) and rather good implemented but R-N range also has input stage level regulation (volume trim ±10 dB). Unfortunately lower tier doesn't have (equal) loudness normalisation. Peace of advice to you, you do pot analog (or digital) adjustment to the reference calibration level and when doing calibration if you intend to use third party input volume regulation (preamp) which by the way isn't the case this time.Volume knob position at least 12 o’clock. Below than that means you’re not utilizing it.
Not really. Biwiring is nonsense.at least, you don’t waste the B. Everything on the amp should be utilized as much as possible.
It may be overkill, but nonsense?! Nonsense is when something does not make sense at all. Biwiring is like using thicker than needed gauge cable, extra measure.Not really. Biwiring is nonsense.
They are (Q3030i) but it can be excessive and needs good distance behind (about 60 cm) and still benefits from absorber panels behind. I use mine with with port's closed and sub's Linkwitz Riley second order crossed @ 80 Hz.Borea are excellent, I think not far from QA. QA 3030i are said to be bass rich.
It doesn't add anything. It's a waste of cables.It may be overkill, but nonsense?! Nonsense is when something does not make sense at all. Biwiring is like using thicker than needed gauge cable, extra measure.
I do biwire and I think it adds some clarity for medium and treble. It may be subjective. Lucky me, it is everyday subjective.
Meh...Maybe Triangle Borea BR03
And how exactly waste = nonsense? I am sure waste = more than necessary = overkill.It doesn't add anything. It's a waste of cables.
Well not when some are buying speaker cables that are $1000+ per metre.I say biwire is a cheap form of waste
I can’t think of a situation in which biwiring is objectively beneficial.It may be overkill, but nonsense?! Nonsense is when something does not make sense at all. Biwiring is like using thicker than needed gauge cable, extra measure.
I do biwire and I think it adds some clarity for medium and treble. It may be subjective. Lucky me, it is everyday subjective.