• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
@Racheski @amirm : would you consider adding a threshold of hearing/transparancy line in the graphs?

That knowledge helped me a lot in understanding what is money well spend. I notice it is a recurring thing in threads that comment on reviews.
 
Thanks to all involved - it's a definite improvement.

One oddity I noticed - for Type 'ADC/DAC Interface' and Channels 'Multichannel' only the MOTU 624 shows up. Others I would expect to see like the 18i8, M4 and Xonar don't.

I propose adding 'balanced' as a tag too, since it crops up in people's requirements from time to time.

What are the requirements for data entry? I may be able to help with the above.
 
@Racheski @amirm : would you consider adding a threshold of hearing/transparancy line in the graphs?

That knowledge helped me a lot in understanding what is money well spend. I notice it is a recurring thing in threads that comment on reviews.
The threshold of transparency depends on playback level and system setup, gain structure.

There's a thread by @flipflop that has lenient and strict thresholds: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-thresholds-of-amp-and-dac-measurements.5734/

If you want to take psychoacoustic masking into account it gets a lot more complicated.
 
For Gr research xls encore include the price of a complete finished speaker rather than only price of kit for a realistic price. Thats 269 (kit) + 500 (finished cabinets from Gr research ). 385 per speaker.
 
For Gr research xls encore include the price of a complete finished speaker rather than only price of kit for a realistic price. Thats 269 (kit) + 500 (finished cabinets from Gr research ). 385 per speaker.
Thanks.
 
hello, how can i solve this problem with this page showing? eyeg
 
hello, how can i solve this problem with this page showing? eyeg
I think it's an issue on your side. No problem loading the review pages on my computer or phone.
 
For the Infinity 253 tower, Amir changed his recommendation to a Yes after learning about his amp failure. So not sure who needs to change that.
Will fix.
 
If the numbers in the review indexes are correct, Amir has conducted nearly 1,000 reviews!

772 electronics
166 speakers
057 headphones
————————
995 total reviews
 
If the numbers in the review indexes are correct, Amir has conducted nearly 1,000 reviews!

772 electronics
166 speakers
057 headphones
————————
995 total reviews
He passed that milestone somewhere in July - data entry is lagging a bit behind.
 
Little snafu, the table says RME ADI-2 Pro but the link points to the Lynx HiLo


1636730850002.png
 
Little snafu, the table says RME ADI-2 Pro but the link points to the Lynx HiLo


View attachment 164929
No, it's correct. Scroll down to find comparative measurements of the RME. In Amir's old review format he would often do on the spot comparisons with other devices.
 
for some reason the index cannot be viewed on iOS (iPad/iPhone) ?
No problem viewing on iPad, Macbook or iPhone here.
 
No, it's correct. Scroll down to find comparative measurements of the RME. In Amir's old review format he would often do on the spot comparisons with other devices.
I see, thanks
 
The KEF LS50 metas are missing from the database.

Also...I remember seeing the music tracts amir uses to subjectively rate speakers but now I can't find it. Anyone remember which review that was in?
 
Back
Top Bottom