Could you get the KEF Ci250RRM-THX!I have the SourcePoint 10 speakers in-house for review in the February 2023 issue of Stereophile.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
My money's on non-neutrality (sorry, character), and a disinterest in letting boys with Klippel toys get anywhere near.
We'll get a Stereophile review filled with poetry and backed by a measurement panel with a few dry comments papering over the discrepancies with the poetry, and overemphasising correlations.
Andrew Jones' name will only be mentioned 1.7 times per paragraph in association with marketing and advertising.
Thanks for this. A 12 x 12 room dimension is a huge challenge. I'd expect loud room modes of ~100, 200 Hz, etc. And then there'd be the ceiling height and what it does. I'm glad to read that you liked them. I too listen to DBR62s in my home. My only criticism of them is they don't play loud enough for a big room. (I wasn't expecting they would.) And I use 2 subs and I don't feed the Elacs much below 70 Hz, where it would be a waste of watts and cause distortion.I got to listen to these speakers yesterday. I didn’t know anything about them when I went in. I found them to elicit considerable joy. I listen on the Elac DBR 6.2s at home, and these were like everything I like about that speaker and more - mostly the bass extension.
The room: maybe 12x12ish feet with minimal treatment. No photo unfortunately. Just a couple absorption panels in on the rear wall. Seated about 8 ft from the speakers and they were placed something like 8ish ft apart. Pulled reasonably far from the wall. So, overall not uncharacteristic to what most folks would actually achieve.
In the room, the vocals got a little shouty on some songs at higher volumes. At slightly lower volumes things were quite a bit better. The bass response was excellent in the smaller room, and the folks presenting said Andrew (who was there) has something like a 20x30 listening room where they typically extend even lower. I initially thought there was a sub or some room correction DSP going on but it was a “no” to both of those.
I heard a lot of speakers yesterday. Most of them were horrible. Seriously - you can discount for the room or placement or setup or source and at the end of the day they were just unpleasant. I don’t think a $60k speaker gets to be unpleasant. I know some are balking at the $3.7 price tag here. I was absolutely delighted when I heard them. They gave me everything I want when I enjoy music of all kinds. For the price, I think they’re a great option, though a bit high. Again, I love my Elacs and have not heard much that made me want to upgrade.
I’m going to listen again today, and am happy to return subjective assessments.
Whatever that dude says, I don't believe a word.
Andrew Jones has decades of experience and an excellent track record. I agree with your assessment that these speakers will be challenged in terms of measured performance. Getting a 10" diameter driver to blend well with a 1.25" dome is a hell of a challenge, but I am eager to hear what AJ was able to do, and sure I am curious about the measured performance as well. In that order.
Bingo! That is the truth that 90% of the people don't realize. All engineering of any type has budget and time constraints.Utimately the performance potential is down to the design brief set out by Jones' employer.
There's only so much he can do for a given budget and set of requirements.
Yep. And the MBAs running the company will change their minds midstream if company finances are lagging.Bingo! That is the truth that 90% of the people don't realize. All engineering of any type has budget and time constraints.
That is pure gold! Reality can be very funny as long as you are not the one under the gun of time and cost constraints.Yep. And the MBAs running the company will change their minds midstream if company finances are lagging.
.....
"Harry, I know we told you November, but marketing needs to be shipping by June."
"Pete, about that budget for design. We need you to cut it by 30%, or we'll find somebody who can."
"Jerry, it's about that $1.37 more that you want to spend on the inductors. Don't you dare..."
"Harry, it's March. What's going on with the June schedule you promised?"
"Harry, you're what? Quitting us to start a YouTube channel?"
Edit to add: I actually use mine in the same way. I only have 35 W per channel going to the Elacs, so I roll the bass off on my preamp and use a single subwoofer to gain back all of that low frequency information. I think it actually works really well, but if you don’t have a subwoofer already and want bigger speakers then these may be an option for some folks.Thanks for this. A 12 x 12 room dimension is a huge challenge. I'd expect loud room modes of ~100, 200 Hz, etc. And then there'd be the ceiling height and what it does. I'm glad to read that you liked them. I too listen to DBR62s in my home. My only criticism of them is they don't play loud enough for a big room. (I wasn't expecting they would.) And I use 2 subs and I don't feed the Elacs much below 70 Hz, where it would be a waste of watts and cause distortion.
If anyone is attending tomorrow, I'd love a couple of photos of the room setup with the AJMofi's.
I really am glad to read this. Those speakers were my only lure to the show -- and it wasn't worth a $600 trip and overnight. But $3700 is about twice my budget, and I'm 90% content with my Elacs for serious music. And if I know anything about Andrew, there'll be bigger, smaller, and less costly stuff to come. I know they have to recoup development and tooling and show some profit to keep rolling.
Wouldn't you love to know how many Mofi must sell to break even?
P.S. I'm even more glad to see a departure -- finally -- from the ubiquitous 'cookbook' 5", 6", and 8" mid-woofers. Somebody had to break that mold, and I suppose the coaxial tweeter contributes, too.
Anyone happen to know what that first track he played is?
Yes, that is the role of the designer in any company that isn't his own. Beyond that every design problem whether it is a toaster oven or a speaker, you must create a design brief and seek the best solution for that brief.Utimately the performance potential is down to the design brief set out by Jones' employer.
There's only so much he can do for a given budget and set of requirements.
I attended one of his demos of an all-TAD system with the Reference Ones. It was one of the best systems I have had a chance to listen to.
Thanks for posting these. I enjoyed hearing what he had to say. I do not find any utility in listening to music played back via YouTube though.
Of course no speaker will please every listener. We humans are too quirky for that. But as Andrew has said in many interviews and to me in person, he designs speakers to please his ears and luckily many people like that sound. I am one of them.