It's not a difficult load for the Yamaha which is rated at 4 ohm.The Wharfedales are a complex enough load that not all amplifiers are going to optimally drive them:
it's not surprising to me that different results are obtained with different amplifiers. Testing into dummy loads is not the same.
Without measuring these specific combinations of amp and speaker we cannot say for certain what the outcome will be and therefore we cannot dismiss even uncontrolled comparisons with the 'all amps sound the same' hand wave.
I agree we should avoid 'synergy' and 'feelings' and other such bullshit words. What is happening electronically is what matters.
What in the world are you talking about?As much as I like Yamahas they aren't best choice for Linton's which deep to 3.5 Ohms. Sanken A-B class Yamahas aren't great with low impedance loads and you should avoid those with lower (than 230) dumping factor.
On paper it should work, in the real world it's a sliding scale. It will work in that sound will come out, but is it optimal? If it's not the LF is where it will be noticeable.It's not a difficult load for the Yamaha which is rated at 4 ohm.
View attachment 305473
View attachment 305474
What in the world are you talking about?
Could've let it slip if you just made one stray statement but three in a row??
Selector switch should always be set to 8 ohm otherwise you're limiting the amp as the rail voltage is lowered on 4 ohm switch.@Holdt where is a third one? I said not a best choice, not that it won't work. Selector switch limits the V and lowers the output W arguably it still gives as much as declared. I mentioned dumping factor and low impedance loads and that's two as much as I know to count.
1. As much as I like Yamahas they aren't best choice for Linton's which deep to 3.5 Ohms.
2. Sanken A-B class Yamahas aren't great with low impedance loads
3. and you should avoid those with lower (than 230) dumping factor.
It's not a sliding scale. The Yamaha is perfectly capable. Only thing of concern is if OP is listening at high SPL at far distance and need more power than the amp is capable of providing. Then maybe more power is needed but then we need to investigate the listening habits of OP in terms of nominal SPL, music taste and listening distance.On paper it should work, in the real world it's a sliding scale. It will work in that sound will come out, but is it optimal? If it's not the LF is where it will be noticeable.
@Holdt well first is related to Linton's not Yamahas. And they do dive under 4 Ohms between 100 and 200 Ohms.
Second they ain't designed for low impedance loads, switch is a safety measures.
Third it's safe to say that any from recent series with two separate amp boards will have 230 or more dumping factor (AS500 +, RN600 +).
However there are amplifiers with better tolerance and higher dumping factor.
Don't get me wrong low impedance (high A) is bad on the long run and not just for amplifier even if it's designed to cope with it but also for speakers themselves.
By design I recommend one modern one with a little bit more power which does better in both regards. I didn't want to recommend anything on DYE or small firm base but something properly engineered (with good traditional transormer and good caps along with procreation circuits) and with good warranty and both balanced and unbalanced inputs. Who knows better be my guest in suggest such.
So your saying that either an amp can drive a speaker optimally or that it can't drive it at all?It's not a sliding scale. The Yamaha is perfectly capable. Only thing of concern is if OP is listening at high SPL at far distance and need more power than the amp is capable of providing. Then maybe more power is needed but then we need to investigate the listening habits of OP in terms of nominal SPL, music taste and listening distance.
Sorry about that, working outside and didn't really gave it a look, mostly autocorrect/auto-fill kicking in.100 and 200 Hz, not Ohms.
DAMPING factor, not dumping factor.
Procreation circuits?
Feelings?When pairing/matching speakers and amps there are facts and room feelings.
Facts: yamaha is a good brand with low distorsion graphs measured in acoustic laboratories.
Room Feelings: yamaha sounded thin to my ears in direct comparison to other brands. (Same place, same streamer, same speakers).
By “Thin” I mean a lack of low /mid frequencies, or too much treble/highs. Yamaha sound usually excels in the upper frequencies in comparison to other brands. I’m not a high frequencies guy. I don’t seek ultra high definition detail. And Lintons don’t.
Obviously you could have other room feelings acording to your personal likes. In this case I’m sure Yamaha could be your match.
Nope. That's not what I'm saying.So your saying that either an amp can drive a speaker optimally or that it can't drive it at all?
Ok sorry for writing the forbidden word. Should I leave the forum?Feelings?
You are on the wrong forum.
if you find their sweet spot, you can get a big smile on your faceI'd worry more about the speakers....
i try to combine my separates ‘evenly’. in the other system i got adi > purifi amp > lintons. the system is about 4k and the separates are quite the same money-wise.Cant imagine spending more on the amp than the speakers myself