Just released...
@Frank Dernie five minutes of your time and your comment on it would be very much appreciated.
Happy and Healthy 2021
It may improve efficiently but not the way Gordon is explaining.
Firstly, he has drawn a two dimensional flow. As soon as a lower pressure is developed under the car it starts to draw in air from the sides, the flow then becomes 3-D and pretty well everything he says is therefore not happening like that.
That is why an aircraft wing has a very much bigger span (width) than length (chord) and is tapered towards the tip. Approximately a portion of the span at each end is doing nothing but prevent the flow from higher to lower pressure areas of the wing killing the lift. The "rule-of-thumb" is that this amounts to about one-chord of the wing at each end is cancelling the effect so a wing needs to be about twice as wide as it is long before it generates any non-zero vertical force from 2D flow, since cars are never more than twice as wide as they are long this means nowhere on a car could be the flow be as Gordon drew, I'm afraid.
The last time cars had flow under them like this was when we had sliding skirts which (mostly) sealed to the ground, preventing the inflow. They were banned from F1 in 1980, so t is 40 years since a car had underbody flow like that, and it was never like this on a road car.
Even then there is the tyre to consider. Vehicle underbody aero in my 40 years of experience is dominated by wheel flow. The air obviously can't go under the tyre so just ahead of the tyre contact patch you get two powerful lateral jets of air being squashed out of the way.
Even when we had sliding skirts these gave disturbance. At least 50% of the aero work in racing is minimising the huge detrimental effect of the wheel wakes.
So, the fan may improve efficiency by pumping air into the wake, reducing base pressure.
It may in some way add downforce but certainly not as explained here.