For the gain, unity gain is the way to go. Less than unity will cause worse SNR. If the gain is before the pot, the snr is what counts. If the gain is after the volume pot, the noise floor itself is what counts.
This is an analysis of whether you are better off using low or high gain mode in a headphone amplifier in their overlapped region. Traditional rule of electronic design says there is no free lunch: higher gain means higher noise. While this has become the "conventional wisdom" and one that I routinely state myself, forum member asked if there is any hard data to back this. So I decided to test the theory on two headphone amplifiers: the Schiit Magni 3 and JDS Labs Atom.
The test matrix here is infinite in scope. What volume does one choose for each gain to test? After pondering for a second or two , I decided to go the defensible route of setting low gain to max and then matching the same in high gain. Both of these amplifiers have analog volume controls and in high gain, they can be touchy as far as getting accurate levels out of them but I managed to get close enough.
Let's see what the measurements say.
Measurements
For these tests, I chose to use 300 ohm test load as that is in my analyzer and hence, higher fidelity than my external dummy load.
Here is the dashboard view of Schiit Magni 3 in low gain at its maximum value:
View attachment 18330
Now let's switch to high gain while achieving the same 3.84 volt output:
View attachment 18331
We take a 3 dB hit. The impact on SINAD is not as large as one expects because the performance of Magni 3 is distortion limited. If you look at the noise floor in FFT in top right, you can see the large increase in noise floor (about 20 dB).
Note also that channel matching suffered a bit in high gain. Slight inaccuracies in the volume potentiate translates into larger errors in high gain mode although obviously this is situation specific.
In low gain mode, the JDS Labs output is much lower:
View attachment 18332
Performance is so amazing that the noise floor falls off the bottom of the FFT produces superlative SINAD of 115.
Let's switch to high gain and match levels:
View attachment 18333
We take a considerable hit to the tune of 13 to 14 dB. As with Schiit Magni 3, our noise floor rises by good bit (around 10 dB).
So I think we have our answer.
Conclusions
Given a choice, use the low-gain setting of the headphone amplifier unless actual measurements stipulate otherwise. In the case of both Schiit Magni 3 and JDS Labs Atom, this is indeed the wise strategy.
----
If you like these kind of articles, please consider donating funds to support the forum using:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audiosciencereview)
or upgrading your membership here though Paypal (https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...eview-and-measurements.2164/page-3#post-59054).
This is much more prominent since dx3pro uses digital volume. The gain is after the attenuation. So all the noise will be directly go to the output.Amir, thank you for this comparative, does dx3pro exibits the same behaveour? I always play this little game "by ear" on all my amps with gain switches and dx3 sounds to me just a hair more noisy in high gain, but of course Is not an AIB test... Presing the gain button an level matching takes couple of seconds and its far from acurate.
This is much more prominent since dx3pro uses digital volume. The gain is after the attenuation. So all the noise will be directly go to the output.
As long as you don't hear it at low gain that's good enough. If you want to "fix it" the only way is to use an external amp. But I don't think that's necessary.I'm not a very aducated person regarding amplifier topology,
Is this a standart? Ateunation of input signal is to be made befor the input gain when digital atenuators is used? If thats so, when picking analog atenuation, is it common to place it after the input gain ? And last, if the amp has a gain switch, does that meas that there are to gain stages in that particular design? first one would be input gain (wich will be switchable between two fixed values) and last one will be the amp gain itself?
Hope, thats clear enough for a question so I can learn a thing. =) cheers.
As long as you don't hear it at low gain that's good enough. If you want to "fix it" the only way is to use an external amp. But I don't think that's necessary.
The way they did on dx3pro has both benefits and disadvantages. Big advantage is that the
volume is balanced from the minimum to maximum. Disadvantage of course is to sacrifice snr at low volume.
The more effective way to implement is like trl said.
DAC - Gain stage - potentiometer - output buffer. This way snr will mostly saved and the noise will be only dominated by output buffer's residue noise.
Sure. I have been doing that for power amps. I usually put in the input voltage level so you can compute it yourself.Talking about gain, could @amirm please publish the voltage gains (Vo/Vi) for the tested amps.
Yes, if you also quote the output voltage.Sure. I have been doing that for power amps. I usually put in the input voltage level so you can compute it yourself.
There is no difference in power when using low or high gain. That's the common misconception. If you can give high enough input signal low gain will reach the same level as high gain. The gain stage does not affect the output stage in any way. They are separated.I am using HD600 with Atom.
I understand that these tests show that with low gain there is less noise than with high gain.
However, when I listen to music it sounds to me that with the gain knob on "High" the sound is more "open" than with low gain, for the same volume level (as far as I can tell).
Could it be that with low gain there is not enough power to drive well the headphones through all the frequencies? Could it be for example, that the bass or soundstage suffer?
On low gain, I listen with the volume knob from 9:00 to 2:00 approximately, depending on the music.
Forgive me if that is a naive quesiton.
I am using HD600 with Atom.
I understand that these tests show that with low gain there is less noise than with high gain.
However, when I listen to music it sounds to me that with the gain knob on "High" the sound is more "open" than with low gain, for the same volume level (as far as I can tell).[ [...] /QUOTE]
In analogic low gain means less noise, so if your amp has enough power to properly drive your cans then keep it to low gain. This will also ensure some sort of safety to protect your hearing, just in case the knob volume reaches max. level by mistake.
You should retest low/high gain with two identical amps and proper level matching, but from what I see in the measurements there's not much change there.
That happens to me every time I switch to high-gain. The reason is that it is much louder. If you equalize the levels with low-gain, that difference vanishes.I understand that these tests show that with low gain there is less noise than with high gain.
However, when I listen to music it sounds to me that with the gain knob on "High" the sound is more "open" than with low gain, for the same volume level (as far as I can tell).
Probably not, but from a hearing safety I would stick to the lowest gain.Am I doing something wrong ?
First of all i don't see why you hear hiss but there can be some explanation with the hum.Hi,
No intention to dig out an old post.
But I recently got into listening to music with headphones.
I have 2 DAC/amp combos to use : ASUS Xonar Essence STU and Oppo HA2-SE.
Both have "hi-gain" setting...
Used headphone is Sennheiser HD700.
Well, on both DAC/amp combos, the statement is the same.
If I use "low-gain" I have to turn up the volume to a point where I distinctly hear a "hum" or "hiss" in the background.
If I use "hi gain" I can keep the amp to really low levels and do not hear that "hum" or "hiss" background anymore.
So I tink will keep using "hi gain" with low volume level instead of "low gain" with high volume levels.
Am I doing something wrong ?